Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sun, 06 December 2020 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9243A040B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 09:10:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OImAXZuWXaWY for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 09:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A5F03A03FC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 09:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id i38so6829812pgb.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:10:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=oH3ZUA24D/WtMB8Q12MkzLAWmtgf8AKQRZrxxIGgAkQ=; b=Qd1M7VJxvZUFlVZNqbg+OzBitKg7ljyu8FAskyVqa/sHItRdqabKZOm2rwyIC0CDrW KtRpA4YxugbPLZkTJEiCRSpavObi/ikINMUnQuWX4FITSKuCPdq4uEpeTP9OdkK4eNbd bAbEODI+c2mR3epPDxPAhycTt5jLyDhR4QpaXJe9qr8ea8WdNqQuPCMcyypQPfTp7pmX y5R+GmREM+BYxkDstBWxnygHabfu+05QuL9u2xmDqIwtrS0WxdZzISbv3xFzBxiCk98E on2UeWzxHmtLBAo6BLjvJy7C/by+q3Rub6tZZCd04FpYb/4oHkkCDyWHTVQOv9RX4eJm ThzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=oH3ZUA24D/WtMB8Q12MkzLAWmtgf8AKQRZrxxIGgAkQ=; b=WP+vlC09QaQTlbP2qlEEPoTRfY9F4cxMV8psMN+K22iYSwU9x+IMA1zArCYojEtTmy dbf5Bag5b85dkiGfI/rOknkMFtlFF2GyaozCL5enbh6GV2ZSqL3A1DRvhCXgIkDGVmBO rrh9N6xCd6gLzmWRv7NAY/iX3S40Ssh/ox6lv1z5IFPfcQn5cQJfjCjSx5QZVhaNgVoj BMgLDD47QEBS+2fN8Q03PbvotYLdo+OwOiX5NvxumKt7pJ9u7AYpU4vr204mOwqfF4Md QaCfYAfvWSfeM8YGKcFS4pSJv6NEo96ZvrY0IinqxMKQpJ6f2Srgfa9JuOcjN3O6gXeN 0lBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eJ27wV/162qy+/8KREavgdVQsZjCzgZrarb9UMzrFGHlX3fTN YSetlbfywFR1iPqqa9j5FQrWuuJ4qvM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYYEpsQh3mjr8TXW3j1UC1sKvX+idGFnVMjYBkYVzBi8AUv4d8waK8XUrCNA5sDBKM/pe/WA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:d152:0:b029:19d:cf97:5242 with SMTP id t18-20020a62d1520000b029019dcf975242mr7302725pfl.28.1607274628223; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm2542549pfh.5.2020.12.06.09.10.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:10:27 -0800 (PST)
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <CABuGu1qpn16+=6CUqpXbAiFrLV87s9Lx4+fqCzNtkD83HVPzEQ@mail.gmail.com> <C456270E-89A3-48BD-B123-1D789682AEBE@bluepopcorn.net> <18e93db9-bde7-bf49-670c-1e680f2ce3a6@tana.it> <65bbc2a6-701a-1729-7892-ef68c1b6b237@mtcc.com> <5bce5710-6553-36ee-c46e-cbde702141e5@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZZ31bYwPphHEDsfeLCRPEZmp7jOZOR5RVof3J5LHxe6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7e4cf4bc-de2b-7f3f-212c-92110f5871b5@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 09:10:25 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZZ31bYwPphHEDsfeLCRPEZmp7jOZOR5RVof3J5LHxe6w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/4UXWyD9vEPaNa_j4boi03SJxQrs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:10:31 -0000

On 12/6/2020 5:57 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> DMARC was not published as a product of this working group. 


which, of course, is explicitly noted in the first line of the DMARC RFC:

      "Independent Submission"

and by way of a contrasting example, DKIM:

      "Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)"


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org