Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 04 December 2019 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA18B1208A4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:01:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQw7KyLvkCK0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A561208DD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id l17so597175ioj.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:01:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dLk3QlrdB+efRbCqWjNgkBXCkhMBf4e2e3c3BneZjko=; b=daGTSUVjO8XY6KpNSACSPHnhiZjtK8hUmqhSCOwsEQCAy/OU3eEqppqUurd3PcYul5 GZOM+iGTmbFJ5Y+6nzd3MpqZrqvRf9qJa/zLUE4ByME64DakBKkeYu3I0CBuls6FYvui vXboqZuAsFRdBNdEZLvLcUGpwNH1X793dOeDw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dLk3QlrdB+efRbCqWjNgkBXCkhMBf4e2e3c3BneZjko=; b=eI4z3nEqcQmjdqYxzGftFZqSpKgf68NSdDQrV7qqteAW85HBmH8jkQoBJzLpv99WZK +2h2H1u93Nl1vZ9myjPQu6NIPVx7Ndt3BCEHpArCB02/mcpwTfy6xfb+73ZzaZQul1ln IMTXRWZwcrrWscQG0lOe8zIddcCB/Dj0+IPPKCW4HQfRzlR1HYlM2U4dctrAwhix2b9g imdo2sgMng6pCA07rSLuZHjzQTVy021zTscRp22LlLah4xOEedpeWQbTtsUTxeiJfc1q ZsKoPhkrD+IQidXwj8bOtfKlTpvSl30eRPDZ8xNCGY/9zH+Ks1eG3w3fiRUb0wUwrYZA OdBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVA6PMJl7wvK6OrVrozm6zwFArQXwjqA4CZcJaj2+lsi5BjFkdj oPzFx2HqFXp5pDKwuZ1XbkLR5Xmvj/UHrBsW4LKO1YgjtB+PSg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzlWFyOxel8SM5Ipp78ICwXsHf5MdigSzLPUnbt3Jo2TUUtgpgOrm4Uac1GNfTjMMvyMaetrpMpq/MpKKd+wOg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c009:: with SMTP id y9mr4261477jai.111.1575482502395; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:01:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwacbAT04tckpPcRcnOt=1QByOBeJ7uDf6rNK6NRwtxZYg@mail.gmail.com> <ffa2bf72-3024-237b-86ae-9cc04babeec6@gmail.com> <74a0ea49-7a46-4eb6-c297-cd703f63bd1b@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbp2hNrgF_xxhKRRODQ6HP=U5_K-r3Wtm1wJZOZcKup3g@mail.gmail.com> <9DE9E7DC-FE60-4952-8595-B2D087A6B780@kitterman.com> <CADyWQ+GSP0K=Ci22ouE6AvdqCDGgUAg3jZHBOg3EwCmw=QG84A@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1obn55Y2=CuEYRYCEO3TYYNhYTsdkesQ67O61jRyfO=wA@mail.gmail.com> <79b1cbe6-8a53-9157-63de-210fd2bad89a@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwZnomZJTbFB=dfFdw2vWg7B0ObRuoage3pcWaYmP9Kp4A@mail.gmail.com> <df19dd96-b346-795e-2ffa-92aeffe8105d@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <df19dd96-b346-795e-2ffa-92aeffe8105d@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:01:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qy1Zx7tGzuZvsW0LwNY+se7jcmfAGYNQF+aO5Sodg+pA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e835650598e49af1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/4fJwgCCBKPpbGoe8XVOy4gks2KE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 18:01:45 -0000

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 2:39 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>
> > Rather, it's primed as a possibly useful data collection exercise.
>
> Kurt also talked about reporting some findings.  I'm embarrassed, I have no
> idea what I, as a receiver, should report.  What data should I, and other
> receivers collect?
>

I was thinking of something along the line of what was assembled for RFC
6686. In this case it would be something like the quantity of messages
which were assessed against the LPSD record and their disposition compared
to the number of messages dispositioned at the org level. Something to
answer Dave's concern about "too much additional work" for not enough
benefit.

--Kurt