IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Thu, 13 August 2020 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69CA3A0802 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NBNQDXZZ0agq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4C23A07FF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id q14so3382347ilm.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YzLMyCnZi8NCiD1NZXM3TjrFqdnYEdDREJmcdXqRyg8=; b=TzTomW1si2nUw1+NIjxBAb1puOKJfjeKdgevNELLosupa3r/3K233j2y2Z/PFejX5d i9NrJDC1XN2+8GNOygFx2ASqyHkKmqhCMg+7GQ8PlfuEnoHtWttqwo31YdVRGYs1It5X NebuxFPVkzo9NV0QXhk+SCAotrsNEZa1U9EFo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YzLMyCnZi8NCiD1NZXM3TjrFqdnYEdDREJmcdXqRyg8=; b=VFqo52cstv7wd0KOLeYahj6cVZtbYC0OK9X+wIYGtJavcWSWEGK8yt8oSA8MCaP486 oWvoVjrtwl1xfXSqG6H/godZiRovHJskwKNZWda95Cc1o0Q5sIgPoZ7zlD7EmP1jesJb 4ulu/yIo0fZUenOKioGn724qd9AHJ4fS5i/2ATYftoQUYMMhtMpxB8N0+hz3YKMZ/AGC n+jL0m4veczAwaj17jPfK9KtJBb4q8eJtVQHrH/J/dUw89mgt7BcZTiB+l+Lzk1B8I1b XDhMMmhQCH//TPy2WIhbPs51mFF9G2xZoVI+pMgW3irCO3keGiH9bfo7d1NpbTNCrXKa N+ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zImib2e1bzJa5WJfEcOhpw5Tj+9YX4EKVf4uyGJI7jqUdj57l I4iIoVrkQL91kVYGy5UPVZltGMk7q0qe1qWmL9qJhA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzztr+f4WmNW9B3u1sA5vserXV7NbdCvHf5qkiQOnSm56MgSolIo2G3CiLUbnWfo7wdGb0zO07hehR5JjSa6TU=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c7cf:: with SMTP id g15mr6270011ilk.120.1597354757319; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200811034740.BA1831E7FDBF@ary.local> <0c8afc68-bc51-702a-c794-610b2d355836@dcrocker.net> <83a8e95f-d85d-634e-0c93-eb2ddab2c69d@wordtothewise.com> <99810a58-3809-bfd2-3571-bac54430f9e8@tana.it> <CAOPP4WHWoVkA+ZWZ+2AFnH8_nKBxO+t3Z4trz347JV0fsEy83Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOPP4WHWoVkA+ZWZ+2AFnH8_nKBxO+t3Z4trz347JV0fsEy83Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:38:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1rCFdCHue-osiDAb2rEUqeR3WsOjbL2hs=FC47aqQRLYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e40cbe05acc922a1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/4pLOUz8QkBt12ZcTcqMzW18SPrE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:39:20 -0000

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:06 PM Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com>
wrote:

>
> Tunable! You said the magic word I have a client now getting spoofing.
>

Receiving spoofed mail or having their domain *being* spoofed?


> My point is that it sure would be nice to be able to tune so that BigCRM
> and BigCRM Marketing * mail would pass DMARC comfortably, and we could then
> turn the dial on policy to cut off the spoofers without breaking legit mail.
>

Passing DMARC is not a be-all-end-all. That's what local policy is for. I
fail to see why local policy would not solve your problem (as described).

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email