Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions

Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> Thu, 03 December 2020 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <me@junc.eu>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35613A0B2B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:11:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junc.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wI-xDK91KsTu for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:11:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.junc.eu (mx.junc.eu [172.105.72.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20CDB3A0B04 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [127.0.0.1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with SMTP id 919628074D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:11:31 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junc.eu; i=@junc.eu; l=341; q=dns/txt; s=default; t=1607019091; h=from : subject : date : to; bh=TgS6+Joaf2tM/9bcZr7NL0I5vKGF/+U2kZLOvqlOYbA=; b=XDmZHTsxWQdkcnHTWnuvo/qs9R83Ca+U/j9SAeQOmKdKbO0zhM8fm/1zm0MJbLBoXWor5 P06Mtj50vxE/iXwmiUOZXw61MoEFUroJLOwBLmw+E4joTGA4sr5JVlUvEPDuYzj5A2lHm1f eIl5PK//OmE9GLi2iDY3TxhnD6O++rk=
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [IPv6:::1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 755E880341 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:11:31 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 19:11:31 +0100
From: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <162586f5-d565-0e4f-955d-8ceca1d569d2@mtcc.com>
References: <20201124020453.AFDC027CE5C8@ary.qy> <cd855b53-d9bd-3412-3bd5-dc4b7720dc5c@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6s0bfs87Fu9eOq_R3WH1pngauVXrw3RSPe9iWWCtf3AmQ@mail.gmail.com> <c954eadd-5c85-c0d9-2168-8a42de506b72@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6swzAQLPU=xE2tr1W0J5r+w80BSYu87_ubMwHaUMgmKvA@mail.gmail.com> <1eed8278-4efa-4abc-15e0-2efcf014e82e@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6sEk+dHwHjBCKDgcmeT_Z3FymC5+jzy-GGa=7gJYvOf5A@mail.gmail.com> <446d491b-100a-9813-6463-2294f67bbda7@mtcc.com> <aafa5e78-aff9-8076-b76f-62f5b3a13fc1@taugh.com> <4190de2d-9f17-06d5-6354-30c989eecd4a@mtcc.com> <17d886fd-49fd-28d8-f8e4-7caf2e85919c@taugh.com> <f785884b-2a3d-a6fe-6bb6-ee792d23ff23@mtcc.com> <d5e9dbe-7d83-d3b1-2aa9-3e3562d3e75@taugh.com> <8bc3c7ad-2a42-3eed-524c-8c50b16131c2@mtcc.com> <42178950-1ac3-27b4-a981-155fd9117969@taugh.com> <a669c3b9-a9e5-91cb-cd39-e73115e90766@mtcc.com> <70bd5e9-f0e8-3bdf-c5f0-6428841e1577@iecc.com> <162586f5-d565-0e4f-955d-8ceca1d569d2@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.8
Message-ID: <125a8014168264de8b7de9488eb3058d@junc.eu>
X-Sender: me@junc.eu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/5S4WPLHRY5rslRaTcKqcWZPnGPM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:11:37 -0000

Michael Thomas skrev den 2020-12-03 03:58:
> if you're trying to make a point about the bloat, you might actually
> get your facts straight. ARC adds an additional DKIM signature and a
> Seal. i have no idea what a X-Google-DKIM-Signature is and is not
> relevant.

would you show an example on that openARC adds openDKIM signature ?