Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 24 November 2020 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790F03A11FB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:50:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uYKgscXLJUO6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70ECE3A11F7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:50:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1606236655; bh=X2Aq1tO4k9TvAvzlIb3dGT2PIQfKCKJjDI8yKBro+uE=; l=513; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=C0Oag6cN5FLzdKl2hcqDgN8AW3QnCYNG/5UkMfedp4Pcn62SuD1N6PPM+n/WY9Bag LpYm80/eTE+yFevv7F7Bf1cM4AoB3Y2Lhe7WkkIg+7KWxQbk1Tdm+AaruT78oVF57I tFAxFbQskKlvzYFvbd0Gy8Q+C0qW8ClPtwTIIlwSQCv6ebIdBv/7F7MqrxSpS
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0C6.000000005FBD39EF.0000018F; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:50:55 +0100
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <553D43C8D961C14BB27C614AC48FC0312811FC37@UMECHPA7D.easf.csd.disa.mil> <20201123210543.694B127C778E@ary.qy> <MN2PR11MB4351DF962549AAF1E46F4128F7FB0@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <a471cfd8-e651-a275-9db7-f88728ff90aa@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:50:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4351DF962549AAF1E46F4128F7FB0@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/5XnqQM4bws-T3iQLUO-J0-QBA2A>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:51:00 -0000
On Tue 24/Nov/2020 13:52:43 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote: > I had one spam message that had 13 parts. It included both "_mta-sts" and "mta-sts" in there, as well as "mail" nine times. The last two parts were the org domain. If the message happened to authenticate, negative reputation is better added to that org domain rather than to .com or to some random mta-sts.mail.something. IOW, if we need the OD anyway for alignment, there's no point in discovery DMARC records by tree walk. Best Ale --
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Chudow, Eric B CIV NSA DSAW (USA)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Chudow, Eric B CIV NSA DSAW (USA)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… Chudow, Eric B CIV NSA DSAW (USA)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc… Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… Brotman, Alex
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] tree walk and Org and PSD, Secon… John Levine