Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis issue: Separating reporting and policy

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 27 May 2019 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1D4120043 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=nvq8qH8y; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=pMXhQWGN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LiKZHbEiNusU for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8570812001A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 38547 invoked from network); 27 May 2019 19:13:33 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=9690.5cec36dd.k1905; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=3dfTvJB/eplRhpl6Rx//pLNNWdZga1Ug+fuj8ndbzA0=; b=nvq8qH8y23udolQetjB3+vlf4/sAKtvVrxP80dJCRh62NNg0EdNMwXwUReiowrK/4IyV+XVX660bhPTLgnm3rijLFJRTp6/j0OIg9Yyv9+XvuVxXpsBppHbJSqzqOYHHcP08IMyZCHpxYVlc/8MYMChIiS+lQwp0M2JZI3duiVTMmOG9603HrYtwFDNtI582VKPzFgmdXIWTHPBU+mcCuX6gL7C/hZn2/wEyZQjNPU3Uu8w3ryBNBvwlXfoft47p
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=9690.5cec36dd.k1905; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=3dfTvJB/eplRhpl6Rx//pLNNWdZga1Ug+fuj8ndbzA0=; b=pMXhQWGNplG0/5swyuXyxI7gj4l2k9wcOcEn2AYbxp+TBVF6C+hTgbT/O8ttWQ7hG7CZ3NCprXjdg4QXP2we7iBwzC9Ql02OHzYmHL8QyRsLh7S//l+/tBe6CIiweqf2gME+0Wng0f0FiultvUGiZRdIH+Mifrb6PV+HBW5jKZ1umsyFChG6rjZES2fNEpi3v8kghS9LPHUDhLp/hNqx1cpbm5psnL7vFsfR3WVezNbeALqAJQ1qdnE9b+wdWYqM
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 27 May 2019 19:13:33 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 15:13:33 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.9999.1905271512200.63625@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <b1192f9c-0816-c333-54bd-df2ad10c701b@gmail.com>
References: <20190523225213.C214620147B780@ary.qy> <ab587c42-dd2f-2403-999a-c7d559764726@bluepopcorn.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.9999.1905241036450.50141@ary.qy> <280824a0-536b-91f1-8072-f7d1cf3051aa@bluepopcorn.net> <789c58b1-7b45-3af0-dd1b-aca0c415db02@gmail.com> <5f12bf4f-ce25-c2d8-7cab-10eb41182eac@bluepopcorn.net> <b1192f9c-0816-c333-54bd-df2ad10c701b@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (OSX 337 2019-05-05)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/5kv1H8XlVlO6_dg5HxYgSlbnrbU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis issue: Separating reporting and policy
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 19:13:38 -0000

>> On 5/25/19 1:53 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> A section like that typically seeks to establish a basis for minimum 
> capability of usable implementations.  It sets expectations for capabilities 
> and limits.  An amusing bit about this particular one is that, in spite of 
> having the word "requirements' in the section title, none of the content 
> language is normative.

It's certainly confusing.  I understand what the list of items is but I 
don't understand what anyone is supposed to do about them.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly