Re: [dmarc-ietf] Decorum on the DMARC WG list and BCP 94

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3469A3A1124; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:14:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cD9fcaRncp3R; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E753A02BB; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id v3so2606949plz.13; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:14:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=092goDxnGbJLGDxdhwJwXI2GYQ6UjkK7BWSXNA9v0dU=; b=nUpZF2HOUUJLNBAE6gBRUB4JrGGm8J18hdEsctB6IH2uLaSte+wK3fuTF6QYKX4bC8 c1aoD0ec4ekUR7/JN0T2Rn6d08S5I3fBQdn0van6cqwOTtfMxouLVZJc+qBW5YG99Spp WK+bUfjjcREmJSigWFBAWfqlz4XBiFMs8auca5Hf0UJfld+PFB3jON8/TSsEF94ze9dF vWRiEcEwuQ+4cCyoytZPs4HNgUMMIEHiN2STb8/t1UcO+fRn3KDtpEBcD0nY6zndMT2T m5dGA4tzXndcGHElegCT4MfQUtjzbW9pxzq2s/3TlyujEDJmCthNI4Mgr0rw8qlD7dhQ ixjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=092goDxnGbJLGDxdhwJwXI2GYQ6UjkK7BWSXNA9v0dU=; b=dgt+fDSLHsdgBhllu4KAawZ0dSsyb1Z4iFRlvtg+HVHrq/po3wU2/rPPwuNL3LqWdG WVBs9AzEwmpWoYAV5CFUmxpicZihKGTx/I/Zobsz6/Fuxds506HSWz8DtuWeQrQVnFpJ uhhJwT7f62x5WbsSgkuWEc1Cr9UYw8HTEvzDWMJOLmzgCZAuSDsDSEzVFse+c08QFCHd QZpOJW6nSPnxMKta1naU/roJdEw1slX9v4RylB+rVie4ckTd8YNp3UEjnj9DpKU5+cff 0BEF+ezjIRbRLwNWa63naVqyQh8H3wbvv7nm2QAC/cM5kvY1ky9RPeMASa0dKPv5irsc R7GA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vxpYD9KfuYO+cCP4npppGvzCxdwbBiOo69+1EVU9Emi+SvPp2 KuZmwdkSbouOO3Qd68xv1sFl8Noksgw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwuqGCDZ1qLCmeLlUnFLhWPQ6i7i6AqbE3cjfrWfLX5S+p6GvZzMaWFpg5dzpowuNMKSoT7Xw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cc06:: with SMTP id b6mr7080776pju.94.1609985645244; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm3170866pjr.38.2021.01.06.18.14.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:14:04 -0800 (PST)
To: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Cc: ART ADs <art-ads@ietf.org>, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
References: <CAOZAAfPW6Oki-4Ebgk9yS1H-r19PBTqE8nDMTFjUKY38JKgrfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <acf32e64-f1fa-25df-b677-2e279ffeb2cc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:14:03 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfPW6Oki-4Ebgk9yS1H-r19PBTqE8nDMTFjUKY38JKgrfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/5ovZ8h_gilS3szRWeMG95ZY3e6Q>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Decorum on the DMARC WG list and BCP 94
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 02:14:07 -0000

On 1/6/2021 4:21 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> and is not likely to escalate tensions. 


Seth,

Sorry, but please provide guidelines for how anyone is supposed to 
evaluate their draft posting, in that regard?

And please do it with respect to the current list rather than in 
abstract and generic terms.


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org