Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Thu, 25 October 2018 19:41 UTC
Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C451E130EA7
for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ZL_3gRPQ_nXy for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D19A130E6E
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id m15so8881091otl.7
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=dhMYQ1JvoAVdHnvlUCiQ1b7jk0Nr4IJY43nXOjXwB74=;
b=YMPyMLOtnvECeg5PWQEfxq77La/0QehCbfvpDcw+lFtke2hPwzt1TmgvFCWW+q2Ccx
NNmD5O15hJ/0h5Zb2AdG+TN9e6nEtHcAnu4yHBZa44voEQlj5SqmMP48DGy1vnrk8Cze
y38EnJeyjiuiLgPEQBce9vE25GirssyxPLfzdz6JMznLFTDUnxEmBsQa1jNoRzHEBpMY
lkEpZzHh36PffPQc1atKV6GgF09MsBesAt9f7f1cg9A6frlCGuuhD6wr2AYJsWvIeYGP
cwoVpMW0iLPeN36oWePIwx9tDjb2i3sbw3u3cgGuIzKufWDTQaefZDjCZpQ39rv2OeJg
5aCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=dhMYQ1JvoAVdHnvlUCiQ1b7jk0Nr4IJY43nXOjXwB74=;
b=iL1jurjC5VrPe0NvI8vgD9C0OazAQgedEU8SlpFYvitX6nz4Krtyv7K8ooyhkkz4wq
rQz/oLJ22WORH3rZgtwLAW9oVVbl7/k6gFJvxMuUR6PsV6pDFZzyP4zhuXgdc8JlkbfI
H2d4QXOOquFJA5ao7JBjftUO6G0T++T8EIBNio/OLKDGjuQlIkUfFOvcDIlY6wGY5Cu0
gARMo6i5ArIqvLXXVHXRFAZdnZR4012D2nyo7ZxCkYh/h6f6AHX4DqkRCRpX3QXkxd60
H9t7f+K+UsYxGdfA2sOLLQcqUQ+5PA0nrxUrqqwCj5QuyIq665dVfTFo2Xa53cM3hK9c
hexg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIA7Tx29l7wyLj3S2tUXHg85msA/PfyANBo0mqH9WD2/d8J9RuB
YbriufR3dYc09aQBpSGxL+6Ihs77CBfpwY0MYwbVmcYVHqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5c/VH7eVy3JQhOByHG/EbkJXxMhDbA20Q0Ul4uVc6Axj/CbeiHc+s/0S+0bqSiND/rZe/ZpxbroZbQ8A3k9Bok=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7850:: with SMTP id c16mr380805otm.175.1540496462129;
Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:40:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WNXBWeAHu9PZ-6adtJEkYHcwU6E+d4WOtgMmyC9On4D6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006742fb057912c854"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/6NbS2QJNgy_bpmRp-k_fAbGzWCQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 19:41:06 -0000
I concur. This is an important work item for the group, and fits cleanly into Phase 3 of our charter. On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:42 AM Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> wrote: > I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00 into our work > queue. It aligns with our charter already. > > --Kurt Andersen > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
- [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the… Kurt Andersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Craig Schwartz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Steven M Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… tjw ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… tjw ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… tjw ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… tjw ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… A. Schulze
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into… Scott Kitterman