IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> Thu, 08 June 2023 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <me@junc.eu>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A10BC151097 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=junc.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2XxHl6V8356 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.junc.eu (mx.junc.eu [172.104.150.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E18EC151092 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.junc.eu [127.0.0.1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6106A807FE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 18:11:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=junc.eu; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:organization :message-id:references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:mime-version:received:received; s=default; t= 1686240693; x=1687104694; bh=CEa/vZLlsQjVz0X0TZPjXH/8bsQfLcrIquB HK+PNUXw=; b=sYK5orrucwcemoEwyafrNy42PJbwGJ+qQASw1Mn423GP9FdOxaE 5boNbO6Nq4YzrpsSrULGz6znNoZmruKdlj8RwaKXHTXSxMOQGm8YlyDISQL7WK8c D7CQwA4IEpoChAGBykGozJ+g7hN9iKSfSO0Lzk8UC8cmbK/BRU68Dyv5pPUJae6A uB5YbhEXgWPpO1c4ahyOnkrgqowqeHkLPAVka6/XQB/O/pvtsc6SAKR7fjYhRBzb 1diNyYeOdfE31tDHYfX1RsEFrNAH6YUuCC4AToTgFQAxNovciL7wekleqKCNxoH7 E+AF0zjLJhenGLO46GK9HxfOsJjMvslJsIw==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.junc.eu
Received: from mx.junc.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx.junc.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with LMTP id 6RO_BdJR3AtU for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 18:11:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [127.0.0.1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EA7580118 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 18:11:33 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 18:11:32 +0200
From: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <66433CD1-BDDA-429F-B7A4-9E972754719F@kitterman.com>
References: <30BB83B2-B454-41B8-992B-8E2569802D9C@1und1.de> <CAL0qLwbx6Y=kmB5pQZx8gNqD=rLBYz1vLOX6ngL=wUHHUm0Hjw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfMtsjcp+aCrwQ2QRc+SHsw3rhwMuTBugRYe44NeiMeKyg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKrXJJXz3pgp85BPswoirhPJtD=uuefVfc9sX1fGkj-iA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2i3WMbVZ0-yQeqoy7P9njyBRU2jdbP2jGtzUnzEE0dfsLR2g@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJY3_=HknSBENOjkUomdX_RXMfXyCxYOd3mjsvS-V=-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfMybMYJrw9dMd=VmhD0oX0w+m1k8Vg=Hn=QJ3UZBLfRNw@mail.gmail.com> <66433CD1-BDDA-429F-B7A4-9E972754719F@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <999757d3d8237edc16dd9f972f18e788@junc.eu>
X-Sender: me@junc.eu
Organization: junc.eu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/6TtzhVDnr0rMSZcYyGrTjQ6xWbM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:11:51 -0000

Scott Kitterman skrev den 2023-06-08 17:50:
> Isn't the way to say I don't use SPF for DMARC to not publish an SPF 
> record?

maybe "v=spf1 +all"

or just something like over x numbers of ips, will trigger in dmarc not 
using spf ?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email