IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis issue: Separating reporting and policy

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Fri, 24 May 2019 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2833C120072 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2019 10:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yzcva3VCWSr3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2019 10:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B24120026 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2019 10:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1558718175; bh=MzRqecso2Gwe9R/U9DIVtXTl6h4KTGv/s+RSNjYhzG8=; l=179; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DgigUxd1n9ayyuypp5eSiFt/a2QKlGCkF3dTzqnmNjLj+oQAuPEmWLS73FOg5H9D7 4OXoyEQT0z0R026yKCg3TYxV9JgSH3cDS9ZJPTOJM2Xm3KCF5yo5UrFsLa4wFnMrBp w8T3ksUhm+v9nbKeyN/+Sh1yoMTxvLqRr7O7KDT+rAHQIW3/3XJpSwlWsZJpI
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPA; Fri, 24 May 2019 19:16:15 +0200 id 00000000005DC03D.000000005CE826DF.0000419D
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <5c2fc1da-ae7c-2efe-fda3-47855d61ade6@bluepopcorn.net> <bc94f806-277d-d68d-7928-670112cf0915@gmail.com> <CAErFxEkSw2b8UrNn2+FogSd=92c9XCePWaL7gk4wG1PDRt5Q_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Openpgp: id=0A5B4BB141A53F7F55FC8CBCB6ACF44490D17C00
Message-ID: <fe45a047-3212-9a85-46d0-f33a44eff200@tana.it>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 19:16:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAErFxEkSw2b8UrNn2+FogSd=92c9XCePWaL7gk4wG1PDRt5Q_w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/6WMhxnqlxefQFMLZcS8lmLrxR-o>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis issue: Separating reporting and policy
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 17:16:20 -0000

On Fri 24/May/2019 17:04:28 +0200 Peter M. Goldstein wrote:

> I can personally attest that this [splitting] was very confusing.

+1.  Let's not split, please.


Best
Ale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email