IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Why are MUAs hiding or removing the From address?

Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> Thu, 23 July 2020 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <me@junc.eu>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED423A0AC5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 06:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junc.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6y28evk763DP for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 06:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.junc.eu (mx.junc.eu [172.105.72.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9506A3A0AA4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 06:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [127.0.0.1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with SMTP id 380DB7FB23 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junc.eu; i=@junc.eu; l=269; q=dns/txt; s=default; t=1595510429; h=from : subject : date : to; bh=bMyMZf3VShNI5nHe2B++PeRyMwAPsnL5iBC1r2t4p1E=; b=Kf6Kb+PjFYpYOAwMyFpNlfBPCZbuv/CRVWJZNTqMlqhx0ebivTjPSNJZStEvqekNdmnuC b+ytXIQuRSZpGUPnFLjZ9PdbEJwpH/tbfeQXNd2wv/TkSaMA60biq0KOZigIRBrd/nj5ekU FIlPpqxh4ZLhDrWeqX2Pi0SvawYlhNg=
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [IPv6:::1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19BE77F9D3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:20:29 +0200
From: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMSGcLAyhV8UPwr7pO9ZASebefG4XdJS1rbBdfEoQW-xE2Wg5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cd9258e6-3917-2380-dd9b-66d74f3a64d3@gmail.com> <20200717210053.674D61D2C431@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwbkhG-qUyGqxaEjcFn2Lb7wPMhcPFEMA8eqptBJpePPxA@mail.gmail.com> <8efcf71c-f841-46a4-10b7-feb41a741405@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbK7GQXkiS+H8GtsvHMzWr4o431Shc7Cc9MhqsTiHfzFw@mail.gmail.com> <bc7ed18c-8f1d-b41b-0a4b-3aa180a63563@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYgs7py1aTQ87pykNT_0dpnrKz=+1DxMMSQMgbwz4XZDg@mail.gmail.com> <5AF00366-DB28-41CB-A1C4-F5BCA77EC969@wordtothewise.com> <CAL0qLwZRYb4yk_WJKizR0UA97XK3VedfZw73YgyTPHuOpxZQhQ@mail.gmail.com> <74a6fb5f7578452f9080cddb8ebbc8f5@bayviewphysicians.com> <adcc1359-6bb6-1237-2967-307b49557cf4@wisc.edu> <CAMSGcLAyhV8UPwr7pO9ZASebefG4XdJS1rbBdfEoQW-xE2Wg5w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.4
Message-ID: <708a775465c2765311742e7c2eee34ff@junc.eu>
X-Sender: me@junc.eu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/6l64GV4FGmltLMTxoRnurKO5SEE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Why are MUAs hiding or removing the From address?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:20:32 -0000

Joseph Brennan skrev den 2020-07-23 15:15:

> Briliant!  I wish we were still using Mimedefang. This wouldn't be
> hard to code, and the results would be effective.

show the source on how to make this work in mimedefang, or will it 
completely fail with spampd ?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email