Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question on ABNF

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 29 May 2021 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB87F3A15CB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6gWnYHjyy0S for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9318C3A15C8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id b18so5792326lfv.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h/Ur5FxjXiwwMQ2pH4DxvSi6NVW7EVCTqLQIkDhzFfo=; b=ArGF00ffrlpL54sjXtmr2IVMmUCelp2eePqoHd7TERJrpqwB4dAfvT+JQgL5CiJjn+ gY20U+IkoQW5SyxDakW6ScNjHIEklE1urVD+4J+9OHz7fsqTrCBCWzh6kk6roz72+UaD xop6SYyXVQa+LcoRqc+wyCccKCgKveyncHDgj3xUMssriaiL/EPSyTLVA9RwuzVpjqNu vjeCLWqGVDC0busK980wtaPEb7aOyiQph5HUFyj3LN/Wg78rg1una3nyqgjoCGmKFUqh X8uxHp+wQgtzVrQNlByhpWCSmnogNL0wQIF02lCe9s6UD8hWyQfEs/YxbVdm31DfIDbk tPoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h/Ur5FxjXiwwMQ2pH4DxvSi6NVW7EVCTqLQIkDhzFfo=; b=BLeSB0R8NhdCIspKQ09jiHEZuoPmjLdgvVjhn2UZVORXzbAXMDB/dviEA9IjLB5LLn 2RCKXz/9jTscKgs4Mq1iNvYPtusTg657llvUaUl7uRxZLLVtQ4G2SWvAN2f306lpslYX tItU3XvOciuMugbXnjdhaEs9+g+NqM7wO+srnZxDLeDE8SacJwBZNn+vdP1cW41R9OCR vcc6RxyX1KE7bzqw/mYQJzvQCoHc0xMistk5Ec3t4/lg2kwkXq2kPYHyCK5SsruqURHK 2rCw2aSHl8FFuaBUP0aRLhbyEfS21aF6FG3s2JIn54EuX8RST1S9cud9HKWXipXxDF/o caZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531JyGGBIqp6qLDn/aZwgBIdqtvLS/wFIZChtMthzpy1j831PLmF mPmrSTC/D4xGoZ2Huxce6KULUzmWj/aVk0LIPBDsL4Ghab4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwd0qqIU6WN238wAfUccQbwuWL7rZB/oXGQfOq7OgA6QoB3LO8Si2GC0/2L3I61qkYlGROFHzJWZ16JhbcZU0w=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b98:: with SMTP id b24mr9152199lfv.216.1622303879194; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+HAtjGu4Y+Nu=mhpru5UUwQFWuk_XZq=UGi1CZU-_ExKQ@mail.gmail.com> <a65d619b-5442-0d07-2188-8690b454f4f5@dcrocker.net> <CAOZAAfMhdQgC8+seU5_3qg7ZvtcaWB3SSED+rLvEpSRKyOjNSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfMhdQgC8+seU5_3qg7ZvtcaWB3SSED+rLvEpSRKyOjNSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 11:57:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+ENE25i9rnkzrvVjHnQe7hDV=RWi_hww0UNFYZZ2_4CXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006fee3105c37a0e6c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/6mb6-UUCSCtCgmCN0UWoFBnGj3c>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question on ABNF
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 15:58:07 -0000

Seth

Done.  https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/116

I realize now in pulling this string that the PSD draft should include the
ABNF details for the "np" tag.
I'll work on some proposed text and have it ready for the RFC Editor.

tim


On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 6:26 PM Seth Blank <seth=
40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Tim, please add a ticket for this
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 13:54 Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>
>> On 5/28/2021 12:10 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>
>> So in looking at removing the "ri" tag from the document, I realized that
>> the ABNF reference needed to be removed also.
>> Thinking about that, I realized that when one adds a new tag to the
>> registry there should be a formalized way that it is represented in the
>> ABNF.   Perhaps the IANA Consideration section should also spell out that
>> for new tags, the specification should also include the incorporating ABNF.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> d/
>>
>> --
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorkingbbiw.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
> --
>
> *Seth Blank* | VP, Product
> *e:* seth@valimail.com
> *p:* 415.273.8818
>
> This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
> proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
> authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
> recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
> distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
> and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
> this email and then delete it from your system.
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>