Re: [dmarc-ietf] https reports, or nits in draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 07 May 2021 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26D43A2F40 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 12:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=TyMa+nYH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=f9aj4CEP
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIYVnzPFOhO2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 226BD3A2F3F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2021 12:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5073 invoked from network); 7 May 2021 19:22:23 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=13ca.6095936f.k2105; bh=aiWX5UISgPlUBXh/3XyWesrFGUjWrPu860egyQZP0m4=; b=TyMa+nYH3S2Qv5TaalKyAselEg3YUwrru2m+6YDbHOuS6Ree0i7tVcv25DW8UbmtIOSubegJmFq4NDGs5MfR6ICJEUJk/QxJHkZC1TVDCTY4Iv4h4tF5b6SZ9NbgGA6/l5TOOFaAbAOua6o39ixlhUd0qPVNHi/BTWUpLxjz5j7p3m1qCYhipUyjfXLsD1Ej1Xo4bgQFfebfrGDLjXktAejA6U+1x2ihXRhwj2ggCnvKlr7L/wliw/IypxOaEQmVHDcSAwalY1ecLvRFOh9uMRokq612FRKz8VgiqyPZKe3atodjal+NcleUdIMynJZXEsD2qcPGL41phuffj9q25Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=13ca.6095936f.k2105; bh=aiWX5UISgPlUBXh/3XyWesrFGUjWrPu860egyQZP0m4=; b=f9aj4CEPanffO7z2H8EjqG7nw8LanG3moOCcGOoutw08Ib5m3ftJi44FfSLcdt+QRq8A5UhbFzWkAkgiPSEzlEdRR9h5uUSKLj3rCfwBO2FAkrLJnHwjgvPI+Q1iiTWSkMENhWKA9RVZKXilxOwB1ESqoBhj1ad98NJjIV5vH7fFmkF5cjxqMNR1EdmOGUEZpfVn8mLYwskbuxHdN8+HsoxiJDnsBwwB8LJDR0FcK3JcyNjOdMwF5UNzsIN46uFVIX7nDrHV/OSEBgnOOGfsLL7bx565y81DGn4KkjbFI7I7IfHgwW0jcvE8nKcTMomEbLQOS9lwCgfJPSNyF72Hpg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 07 May 2021 19:22:23 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1F07D722C73; Fri, 7 May 2021 15:22:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F953722C55; Fri, 7 May 2021 15:22:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 7 May 2021 15:22:21 -0400
Message-ID: <6c22e275-b72e-112-7646-96531e20da32@taugh.com>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: "IETF DMARC WG" <dmarc@ietf.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaa+AECxVwTgQs9=HBPxEb072eb41QmsULaLwGsTHS-qw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB4351736953B3058184CC7991F7579@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20210507164115.462AE720C41@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwaa+AECxVwTgQs9=HBPxEb072eb41QmsULaLwGsTHS-qw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/6xIAhmiXKqqgaPGhtGu6DsC3-Bk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] https reports, or nits in draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 19:22:32 -0000

On Fri, 7 May 2021, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> [ mail and web departments don't talk to each other ]
> If that logic also holds for mail people and web people,
> I imagine the lack of interest here has a similar basis; we're talking
> about standing up a whole service or endpoint here, not just adding records
> to a zone file.

That's true but there's also the fact that a handful of analysis services 
like dmarcian and valimail collect a large fraction of DMARC reports.  If 
a few of them were interested in https reports, it'd be worth adding.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly