IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 04 June 2019 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6031200CD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 02:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jxmbA9vut48J for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 02:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE11120046 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 02:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.22.211] (80-64-77-66.static.acetelecom.hu [80.64.77.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id x549hrbH019729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 02:43:55 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1559641437; bh=GnuQRA6JKAYwZJiKZ1DB97ccQk+NY8tICKR6Anr0mK0=; h=Subject:To:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=KR8vNB1niiwOxCprmmwNJzM5n1OzsR64XjuLI/sLaqhHcZn5RudKjHE/saCzPMATI kdSt1aJPDfpfa2FhZOP9bM21R8ckHuJ0K68JXmLpKnquQF442L+p3jJYBIbEzG0JBn SInNauAuu3EbD4JiVNCIVy8S8yCTGCid9jcqb5SQ=
To: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <26D82EA6-8E39-4AED-BB9D-E2F53E7548C4@aegee.org>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <adeaa778-5025-6fa2-0fe4-d10e2ea984c4@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 11:41:46 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <26D82EA6-8E39-4AED-BB9D-E2F53E7548C4@aegee.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/7_-qi52kg92VM-M0Hnyilv2TUdA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 09:46:00 -0000

On 6/4/2019 11:27 AM, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> A DKIM failure report is sent, on which a bounce is generated

The rule for mail-handling notification messages has been that they do 
not contain a return address, in order to avoid looping.  Shouldn't that 
apply to DMARC reports, too?  If not, why?

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email