Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limitations was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Stan Kalisch" <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net> Fri, 12 July 2019 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A361200F3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailforce.net header.b=IBEuE2Kh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=trbqXCfy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtqyyQsnOGSj for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31DA1207D4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737DB205B8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:01:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap6 ([10.202.2.56]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:01:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailforce.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=U2LfsYxZOPSH7gQo0C2FEOFgxYpCZOs K6bbxYqiB/Q8=; b=IBEuE2Khck+oCJOfw+DdQZkgBWPy8plPjhL4KsvE73rqv1v eX9Mump1FtzbPUq1RCo7/tlrKlnj9j/86/SKpvwo5ymufxk8Yh1RMpjnEnFfABxC znTXI4eOd64iNuCj76XREmp55/zh5PYkyptIFRI84+sEnhDJitSOZIBp+WlcBssZ Q2yeKw8neJxG4L/HRlHGsEYtOcXW6zuwxrWmAQa17+Mn8uhXQvZ5KAnKo43x2wwz 2nZn91HhlV5qj36kawaSYjN/2y1L50DmfO5msh4gGd1HW3s6lJkmoOBE7LptQln2 cQ4tYTuYJnRQhvx/++upfCu70r6tg3IbKTmmjWQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=U2LfsY xZOPSH7gQo0C2FEOFgxYpCZOsK6bbxYqiB/Q8=; b=trbqXCfy7gRRHPoE/fYyLa mo3kw3UxaHKG86YAR2xXJIYHdjKjaY7d7ZWppwnQfmYRx4ylIj4nvCvZW+Loo+IC 9cPWCKv3jtJQUOES6sKInHTxwJcFCFFMwtqT+UhTT2GdliAK6mkwot5Tnf4CkyA1 Q8Sx4E9lnTZ0YEHW9NNbPyHghgmPBhdc8GXaYn53wqQyAWFGDXUeH1ZeUxJAXNZl BRsyQk1cIxTumosozdq8UoxPfL+JnAxM0g3YangGPr8F7tUcY4g7a0BXf1XPks7l 5hWUV4anw85XayJBHYJzWdF8ftVoQ9B01UHxImtOiu04fta1BrL56OMkKI9jNECA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6MooXZL3s3RW-H0_d4Jl-l1USBGyJ97_618hl-SBDAx6ml0Ibb62DQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrhedtgdduudelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfufhtrghnucfmrghlihhstghhfdcuoehsthgrnhesghhl hihphhgvihhnrdhmrghilhhfohhrtggvrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrd horhhgnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsthgrnhesghhlhihphhgvihhnrdhm rghilhhfohhrtggvrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:6MooXVu7lodbQYqmP4kvIMMkjoVmzCiZ8JdrSBMVcqrmjwBjMINBsA> <xmx:6MooXam2ByJs_fPdAfLwNq1CHfsQk2ZCsfdWhxgzqcF7XhUSoDTEJw> <xmx:6MooXUnoeoVgiyCEg_Bl5uA4to07SqZdq2h5LglTFhBP6njC2J3ZUg> <xmx:6MooXZNympQUDkCIN6Cov1dyLP76PPJ3r3VI5fgx8PWDqAbgrvgVxw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 12A341400A1; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:01:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-731-g19d3b16-fmstable-20190627v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <53901c28-8542-40a0-87c1-a11e935e6afd@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1783751.gHVjF1RMII@l5580>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com> <1783751.gHVjF1RMII@l5580>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:59:55 -0400
From: "Stan Kalisch" <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=c25385236c6f4b70993a0b6ddec27bf1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/80hOaEMOQXIoq8P_i2FI5Y3cZn8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] =?utf-8?q?Mention_ICANN/operational_limitations_was?= =?utf-8?q?=3A_Re=3A_Working_Group_Last_Call=3A_draft-ietf-dmarc-psd?=
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:01:18 -0000

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, at 1:41 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached consensus
> > that must be resolved during WGLC:
> 
> > 2. If explicit call outs to ICANN/limited operator capacity to implement
> > are needed
> 
> There has been feedback in favor of adding this and none against so far.
> 
> The specific proposal is:
> 
> "Please note that today's operational and policy reality prevents this 
> experiment from being deployed globally. If the experiment shows that PSD 
> solves a real problem at a large scale, the results could prove to be useful 
> in the development of policies outside of the IETF that would permit its 
> ubiquitous deployment."
> 
> Because RFCs are (approximately) forever, I'm concerned about words like 
> "today's" in protocol documents, even experimental ones.
> 
> How about this instead:
> 
> "As of the writing of this document operational and policy constraints prevent 
> this experiment from being deployed globally. If the experiment shows that 
> PSD solves a real problem and can be used at a large scale, the results could 
> prove to be useful in the development of policies outside of the IETF that 
> would permit broader deployment".

"[D]evelopment of policies outside of the IETF" strikes me as a little odd since IETF isn't setting policy *per se*, although substitute language that is just as succinct is escaping me at the moment.


Thanks,
Stan

> 
> Also, since this is about ephemera and not protocol, I think it should go in 
> Appendix A.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Scott K
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>