Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #11 (and #112) - Proposed language

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 16 June 2021 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476993A212D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=DF5qclqs; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=HN7xkhgt
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96Tp8G6hYjZA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392AC3A212A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 62959 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2021 18:02:23 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=f5ed.60ca3caf.k2106; bh=BLJMvBAjukk/yLTjunXjxlIsj6spZ6S2qA9pMEYLz1s=; b=DF5qclqsnG0gwkrz0/5WTSJhPpuOFWbMe0HcxaDupK37HPrEVNiaaem08CGwaby9hq6q/B7x0ZbwpOTOQ35OaB7nmjyI8ci1o0SnXcbqgqWak8IdPuxNseykUQepMehe7J5TvAN9UlBBfanuF6x8Sy5mxz9UN9lW0C81UPaV9RQr8mTMycHkca7x3UR97pbSjzSCj2qjN1NAlOJNiN0c6zxFrX7xwr2k/9Vr7jPUSCXxc3nFBYiba9TviXHUi+5R0UtsHAU4Yz7767aGK/2vRomAjonVmoWl7j0dY9A8ncJaucoSKyhSadUekru/RMRNvcth9dz8UoWJDl7T5/HOBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=f5ed.60ca3caf.k2106; bh=BLJMvBAjukk/yLTjunXjxlIsj6spZ6S2qA9pMEYLz1s=; b=HN7xkhgtj+/51oJglyy8z3wC4Pix3Rl8nCqEI4C7gwffwWXqH2PmlAdvVanr2eOe17ME+CUTgwgi1TpT4B5CXS8mlI/OL9XCLbRz1gfxp+LpesiAlmWMhgJ/V0/B4TyADikoe4lltqTIDZV1P8g5WKsnpnLVVcwp8Ap0YZ2Mz15s3CxeU2m3jToKxDRSwi99JNFMCzSyxFcEzmhJbNkWJvq+Sveolmhik+6cjAxs8iaupe9H1UucTCJ1xsGiF87OLULs8X0jT5qpqCEjSgfzSEMX8Umdp7TXjLNxvtmXKLKIL2bckIZ9wAA0SW4+ChCfoVo5ogY/z8NvJnUGdzPqkQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 16 Jun 2021 18:02:23 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 53DC311FBCDC; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 16 Jun 2021 14:02:21 -0400
Message-Id: <20210616180222.53DC311FBCDC@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: vesely@tana.it
In-Reply-To: <71e61630-0bc8-c9f1-6e7c-5267889c15af@tana.it>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/88X_01-UUxG_fnwBItgB4Zv7i4E>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #11 (and #112) - Proposed language
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:02:31 -0000

It appears that Alessandro Vesely  <vesely@tana.it> said:
>It might make sense to reject that ~30% which doesn't even have an 
>organizational domain (dubbed totally astray in my previous post).  But I still 
>receive From: <please.post@publicly.invalid> on a mailing list.  Rejecting that 
>risks getting unsubscribed.  Perhaps mailing lists deserve a special permission...

Or perhaps mailing lists should refrain from forwarding messages from cowards who
use fake addresses and don't sign their mail.

Either way, I still don't see what this has to do with DMARC.  Let's close ticket #112 and stop.

R's,
John