IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #61 - Define and add a simplified (redacted) failure report

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 09 December 2020 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186E93A1175 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=hTAFp/rZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=D/PLHPzm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9kpBdWRBcwy for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3DBC3A112D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 45696 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2020 21:39:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=b27e.5fd1441e.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=t8BI6yOl17cait51Hdc+yj/05ZuBcl6Oynyer2T5aM4=; b=hTAFp/rZSt2gY9lzCQGs98aTsS+TdP1XwSMb5xFFw9zHUWyQAB36cxyJ3F3U4oLKyBrjzkFySD+UI5MQDDlvTdXBoD1DDhPIDa+GuBtneTRunCABC5THKWsv3PGwriMP81bMzBP9RrKO4F6pw8zWZJwdsVo3pRInQstwkEsh8TeNTmf2SOtOoRU8MiEHA4/r1svihMAxVuJuWMZAcUvQZ1Ye1KRTEhStQtp10mUNr6WVSmTR4U5KDXxUxlofr1anGNslL3wCBcVZ40t6UyIN+fngPKOb/rhBmTsDNJgBUGojYlA6BWJ3DerB4vyOlgtzIxTdyaFBQA9CBhXQpNXLfw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=b27e.5fd1441e.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=t8BI6yOl17cait51Hdc+yj/05ZuBcl6Oynyer2T5aM4=; b=D/PLHPzmuS3DQnwErEBza8AJ2kpyl1c+Bw6vFOBzL5trWjKBZDkpOhJPNSwBILV80L5Q2H0bLm4qzc6FIC0GI1BR9Yb0gHVxqk4hZVpdojM2Wp9GK8cpa6W4oawMWbzJIb3d7EU9ch1EsfF8dgoJm0bFGtlW6B+mcIfp/M9fzIeKO6YEMKLRmWWVlVCGwThi4KzChGBoMXb1H3HY8l9koCH+XaMGLOcOAjp9nCl0GFA6gN4TV2sOi5xEoR+DpiUXssjSXuoqDGusVvlzi3aASYc1Ha/jQkNa41ITYTP1RrIxz+s34PD6UFaRpXUHYSpZ6zkdPz8a6vaux66WSb1LmQ==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 09 Dec 2020 21:39:41 -0000
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:39:41 -0500
Message-ID: <13972f3-7815-62ad-63ab-a349cee658e1@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6sU0RQLSBA2LRk4mnkpzWVP5qBMbbHeTaw6VdgG02preQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <609e1c9b-cc4d-d7d1-0fa8-79f515c1eee4@tana.it> <20201209185246.1D40C29474C4@ary.qy> <CABa8R6sU0RQLSBA2LRk4mnkpzWVP5qBMbbHeTaw6VdgG02preQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/8Uz4qPMmB5EMspVJhNJJt4tC7fY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #61 - Define and add a simplified (redacted) failure report
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:39:47 -0000

yOn Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Brandon Long wrote:
>> I think that if a reporter isn't willing to provide the headers it's
>> unlikely to provide anything.

> In today's much more privacy conscious world, should we have RUF reports in
> DMARC at all?

It's a reasonable question, but a company in Redmond WA is sending me 
unredacted reports every daay so presumably someone thinks they are OK.

I agree they're a lot less popular than aggregate reports, and don't see 
any reason to spend more time on them.  That's why I didn't propose an 
http version of ruf reports.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email