IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures

Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Fri, 05 May 2023 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C38C13738D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 May 2023 10:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QATwLTPbh4KR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 May 2023 10:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95501C14CEE3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 May 2023 10:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f1728b7431so265e9.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 May 2023 10:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1683309519; x=1685901519; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k4U9T+16FL+fWfKHuGjLps7G28wOPbG+a5jXVX8Xi58=; b=YpyE0bPoBZIbeNFPzFeZGlhlXToZDnaJ6As3+CAZtrLql9+iZHJWN9HtNIvEVrhTsO n5SWWiftLiXoEkOLzacWyWO2jJngl3VT94NEiDJ7+2kGCx/LO/OPC20jN9ns5Yvek54T fX8BqKAbRzk83JCB+gfyz9ssrFBefQJAkkvP2Ryg/CEmYrw8l35KIdyEyiL7wo44qZRN qCRWfFv/ZNyzxmEmexElQlcAfDCBstSAZTuqhnqbaNdY7TOIg2UaEDoPUwYrAw2BacwW cuXKc3xMbk2yJ50cZMwcRweQyg8Jm/lbIwNlgdJD2NagnJGN8lBYdL2LOlvjf1Gq5Dc0 AI6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683309519; x=1685901519; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=k4U9T+16FL+fWfKHuGjLps7G28wOPbG+a5jXVX8Xi58=; b=OzOwg7hwaIUZLSxs0UMbZ76UeebrIkhEsT6WXXVRoghGQkQJDmw1LbxxYe6Zdz8Vg2 Ad98dwSwKvfumevmDHjw2MPQGFKCC5lhBMrD5ArLVsanfEeRQB4uob/Z3yf+kXrAdqjx 6LbrO3PHrlr2Bi+0HSiONPN5/zzckR5CCMVYqLXNa6VE7A72/vbosVCOHFE0y+2kK7Fs j1wKd1HSvoKgzoo0myCEl0d7McOmGlrOPtf6rxHp/opIDTGXhiHMIGeHeHsK3zq5WNcm 5SwjEDP2KsirMZdtE4hlQIPULbnm4MyUemJnGC0kTosIwFaGNN9Xvm63NFm/eHhat7wL JknA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxOiiZdz4H4JqDz8R0uwPf9YPBscCJoClfOb6gbvuY0uLMwN2nr +pw1g97AXJbTJmEaTw/6bU4/8bPpN4CnF3zUV4wMNQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ57RHfzQE9kh5PnbN2gHADEBJULLhRvaw4PHszIEoDmhygweq5dF/SbBNWfSh0PJBOYjf4Otd+DIV3ruX/8qng=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:35c1:b0:3f3:13bc:f6bb with SMTP id r1-20020a05600c35c100b003f313bcf6bbmr1486wmq.1.1683309518673; Fri, 05 May 2023 10:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwa9DoTCVCOOgrB1NySd2-aE-5wVSGsLNh=8k7xwDLgrTw@mail.gmail.com> <20230502170640.E2095CAA204B@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwYQLmJiG9wjyim42xPiQvXZxNxoV0j2HtxZeAV1bAWz=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYQLmJiG9wjyim42xPiQvXZxNxoV0j2HtxZeAV1bAWz=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 10:58:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK1fcsdse9EVKaeEerV14Zx0imuM2yAZLxGPzZUEZRvvjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000f1ece205faf60943"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/8qivOv7WxYzaSniA8zzon8PKEco>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 17:58:41 -0000

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 10:21 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 10:06 AM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>> No large provider has ever expressed any interest in either so I cannot
>> see any reason to spend more time on either one.
>>
>
> I believe Wei has expressed interest in the transforms stuff, but I don't
> recall whether that was a commitment to implement and experiment.  I know
> how engineers at big companies are.  :-)
>

It is not a commitment at this time.  That said, we are interested in
solving this problem and welcome collaboratively figuring out the right way
to do this.
-Wei


>
> -MSK, participating
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email