IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E083A1123 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:54:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=REp8xM5f; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=MMl0cZO6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2A8sd54ryrz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:54:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66E23A109D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11643 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2021 19:54:34 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=2d78.6019adfa.k2102; bh=DqFu58y0XYhpqWHtXXQeluKbS1M5Ugfo7O83YqEdVnc=; b=REp8xM5fC0mbFTkJOEWyG1XxFvM9lfE9cd0BbqCVCZjzz5HFHX+GG6wDgyKBapaZ1ohEA04oo1yp4wAJDSc2iduphs6YQTzeDkJtth0LT2PTABCqMrnlSe8BqeGLsPVJ8Z8G/Gj0ee1Fn6cnh9HN5zTwhI+YrvM9Jkb9qZMS62dLHVQ6/Vb7sReb9FK9axfMcYjF/L3D/KWva00GeYmsVmz58BS7Jgx6FeLXTvYe/4aSYspHWvWlLloZytRhU6ARGQ0MapxKgEO7wtB/zq/zXtHaSBnSamECOtvPRJ8T43Htbf4p4TaI0I3YGnBbS8ElgzdAS8Pniw+aDff+I4bZng==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=2d78.6019adfa.k2102; bh=DqFu58y0XYhpqWHtXXQeluKbS1M5Ugfo7O83YqEdVnc=; b=MMl0cZO6ng27AhqedsoiGBSI+l534rKEIkChPwFZm2Gac86kh6Qc37W0t9rGus+i9F80boYIHoJe1TZGB10xCa/lO0SuDR5FTrVey3x9qhMh70vRvgR1L1am+WrWSjz3FssKgFqoA2xhaLvq8DTpaoP0yPBt0DcJrITU06kdiNU5bfGoqDW1EGBsVzOvUH2baG9vyw3+LNSeVy7gqzSp7QmWVath7AASLYMbBRJD6dtVN0p0SRsyKBybKmx3ZrUs8jBbaM9Uufs9JWmqABqUQJJcaRnnB4lKeDXB8qJILpoPjLmrmoDxNFK95/zBNBJZcdk9pMbmxBANoxFC6kmw2g==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 02 Feb 2021 19:54:34 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0FA586D2DB9F; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:54:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7F56D2DB81; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:54:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:54:33 -0500
Message-ID: <40a52ab3-748a-c898-aa66-b335b720c73e@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4A21A4F6-4021-4C38-A707-0141593A3849@bluepopcorn.net>
References: <20210202174909.517906D2C88B@ary.qy> <286b8e6c-67b4-2c16-1632-16bf8cd95b78@tana.it> <18d01d3d-9a22-fe33-fa36-8f3a92cce4@taugh.com> <4A21A4F6-4021-4C38-A707-0141593A3849@bluepopcorn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-328617930-1612295673=:21435"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/8uDeM9WNr9PGNVBU4ruDBnx7Nv4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 19:54:42 -0000

>> There is some commented out code to not pass a HELO result to DMARC, don't 
>> remember why I turned it off.
>
> I’m lost in a double negative here: did you turn off passing a HELO result to 
> DMARC, or did you turn off not passing a HELO result?

The live code uses whichever result it has.  The commented out code only 
used a MAIL FROM result.

>> Again, I believe this is typical of what DMARC validators do.  It's 
>> existing practice and I see no reason to change it.  Can we stop now?
>
> If you found that you needed to turn off something that’s part of the DMARC 
> spec, it would be good to understand why.

I believe that what I am doing matches the spec.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email