Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Thu, 14 January 2021 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4483A119E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:51:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WoF1WdJQQxYk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6467E3A149D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:51:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id u17so12935566iow.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:51:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WMturFuGkGjPf0w7X6T/bNI+6ciA7hJ1p+Lmte/ey60=; b=SuLN7b5+XqYGqO0oLQKk2s3q8fdIxRxXWDCVuVwqtQuarnWSTZW5KPSa2CAqnVpkTF mzUZopdw38nLn92oSRbrUv09OXwhr+autFh54A4RuRNjaR7vQMKTaOe/9qeGPr6l8LOq DUrzCi4uEIL+GuPB2vSG4PQvaQOVX4OBRPSl4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WMturFuGkGjPf0w7X6T/bNI+6ciA7hJ1p+Lmte/ey60=; b=EVrEcqCqORuV1tOQzuhykc5I99YW0gfPD3FOGBOehBHQlV91QUbTfhP4vY+lzprKi/ UtvcU0kCRqCkR+VggTkSD9gdv9N+onHAZlaIreySav+qq5dOm3IuSucItj5SWNqc1/n6 r+8NCJS78ikfYkdMK5u+rGY4oOctfL6sRpynOP9AVjiyrS1L5BOZ+DFUbR14VVVde3/l E5AyOpqqtlDwubv93KFXMEWq4Af/HMT41DbsCgO8NxnfUtsOCUrt+XJFvOYjnfVxsxDO klM/6hI1Xkp19kMC/hoHMv7dR5ijtF4ugfKybXLSljG7EiYc1fWSW4zuadUefhtwx3Jc y0OA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331q2zGeKjjcpC+LkdW3LGc1OO0UdjpXnQzLDU4kPqA/NUGYrnH 63rtedT72l2LeIeWj/usgOeZdL56YPqCBbxGLvHOIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2SB+pCeayJ26IBEBVzXj/IaaVrUDNSzMWazYr9U1a6gUliOultR8fZ3gDkRE9MumYuC6yF/bjhUX8HPmDEA0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:9f15:: with SMTP id u21mr8069497ili.120.1610646659474; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:50:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwaZx97cztehz_o=cCVZRbEP_yFVS9hTqWDKg7cMgjNvFg@mail.gmail.com> <9b68024a-f538-af7a-3a9b-e2ad2657ce9b@crash.com> <621d4aa5a72baf46b45a005f8e45eab6f7421e50.camel@aegee.org> <CAL0qLwa2Xy-aM_p1ebmHfOvPfo8SKeivMjp4qQSh_AyXHWr=-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa2Xy-aM_p1ebmHfOvPfo8SKeivMjp4qQSh_AyXHWr=-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:50:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1oK+4xHjs-o0i617MGxuGaQVmrR-3_Tfrec=_1BWz5NRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?= <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ff3a7705b8dfe5b8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/94OF0gfiODzZFJ-G9zJ6aH3Sx3c>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:51:05 -0000

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 7:28 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:12 AM Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I have not read the thread “Ticket #28 - Failure report mail loops”.
>>
>
> Thanks, and apologies to the group; I should've checked for an open ticket
> on this topic first.
>
> This one recommends rate limiting rather than simpler "don't" type
> guidance.  I think we can table this until that ticket is open.
>
> A possible approach is not to send failure reports for messages
>> received on the address for accepting aggregate/forensic reports.
>> These messages shall just be excluded from all calculations.
>>
>
> That seems plausible, though less bulletproof than simply using the
> address already reserved by the email standard for administrative messages.
>

I thought that we discussed that ticket and decided that the incidence of
problems was low enough to warrant a "WONT FIX" determination.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/?gbt=1&index=W3uGPEpT3Yi5lqKntZXyL8jkNjk

--Kurt