[dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-03

Tim Evens via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 11 March 2019 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037491311D6; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tim Evens via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.93.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155234487991.23094.14124317288389045798@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:54:40 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9GllCptvSJtQq7CS-bjrH8GZBAs>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-03
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:54:44 -0000

Reviewer: Tim Evens
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-??
Reviewer: Tim Evens
Review Date: 2019-03-11
IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Ready with nits.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Throughout the draft, section references (html rendering) does not correctly
HREF the RFC and section.  For example, page-5 Section 6 has a reference to
section 6.6.1 of RFC7489, but the HTML rendering HREF links to this draft
instead of correctly linking to RFC7489 Section 6.6.1. Ideally the references
should link correctly, for example on page-3 Section 4 with "Section 3 of