Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 14 January 2021 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CA83A1332 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:35:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=gOcJUDTN; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=ZRbuZxQV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eUu_Br2GI0tx for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:35:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E76D13A1230 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20472 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2021 17:35:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=4ff2.600080ed.k2101; bh=0lMGAtzWX2rE68DB5JMt4/OrJb+3sRVYl4qdV16l0Kw=; b=gOcJUDTNt4k6z7Ta7PpUhvfyP/naxvDAzY/4vg4osHhPbWF7rSzC96JafJJyZ/7WQ9lLLKZDzdygV8OXwbSqpgKvwCrZyBv7lV4e1tZPdS5VNOaO85cVMBAwBj44kSVAzImTWN8wEbbq5WhxnwbzVDer3OC+Jv+VpwIgtcmwQ50Olit2IDMD4k5k3FZ7HETa2MPU+9xt8nLR3gckonntrhwJKSZx79ne57qqttFE41zkdOht9xnaentbZnUgtkSxbG7E3kckkKCzpIaUWhiA/MA9QGvFhWA/Z3VPqfJCe6Skabs0wabjy2vWOr/3v26eLH/8g5td0ucPz8O8gRTglQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=4ff2.600080ed.k2101; bh=0lMGAtzWX2rE68DB5JMt4/OrJb+3sRVYl4qdV16l0Kw=; b=ZRbuZxQVK761z26gwyjImaUqff5qX+rrP/o4+ndqqgHr5WjowuUdqWSs9E2DnMuNrOSEHbA623jYw3ZOFqLXFnniIZsyHaqjX9HoPzWjWvwM1ahCazqc6tdNwEB+sM4lI5/0CFPJ+Uc/ng0Gab98JT4ESoFWDNNkij2WTSoXRbdGflP0C9MZyDgcf9Ueuwn5uqHhvOPU+B8yG3KZDD+789++CJjOBEXq+YUJN3hWmPcTISbVDBKexzErmd0D4VdO8Pw0b4zc8B/ByCIxfAQHTx9RP6XjXOdGRrtBB464vFOw561KK2GpqThF840CdG67OxmLPP+vIV8UwosmPSrFWg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 14 Jan 2021 17:35:41 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id B2B4A6A6C816; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:35:40 -0500 (EST)
Date: 14 Jan 2021 12:35:40 -0500
Message-Id: <20210114173540.B2B4A6A6C816@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: superuser@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZVWRFnaK1iqMC800GCt651xwu=dEqhz=r9Z_CG2y3AKA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9P44n-MbaZkJajCjk9WnBNflT0Y>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:35:45 -0000

In article <CAL0qLwZVWRFnaK1iqMC800GCt651xwu=dEqhz=r9Z_CG2y3AKA@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 1:22 AM Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/13/21 20:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> >
>> > How are implementers dealing with forensic report loops?
>>
>> The question of whether such a thing is actually ever seen in the wild
>> should be asked, if only to document that it was asked and answered. See
>> prior "this is a vanishingly small number who cares" discussions.
>
>I'm asking the question in response to an actual use case.  Granted it's an
>isolated case so far, but it comes from a not-insignificant organization
>that probably handles a substantial email load, so at least for their side
>this is already happening, or could happen, at scale.

Why isn't the solution to fix the sender's configuration so the reports
are aligned?  They're just mail messages.

R's,
John