Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Brandon Long <blong@google.com> Tue, 10 December 2019 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <blong@google.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA2812018D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:15:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Atof84LAGpn for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe30.google.com (mail-vs1-xe30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 981F51200D7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe30.google.com with SMTP id t12so14291460vso.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:15:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BykQfmtBWusm2qCg+s9Qk8SFVtttQI9wccVH5ocmm4A=; b=X2Rfk9I++1FYZJcbkBzBSisjAzLkX/zzbbI8I8LEeey7eOucZh0ZTWjDBgN9h0OROr wKtFA4axj5aIicvGf75G+18+WZCsC9+G9qkvB5PNA42Z2sI39zog8mnv3DHL3wWpfb5m 2D0jEeLBJSTM+4BtxWB/phlUHzu/SwflXKsDKZ0ab/6V7dXleMcuf/l2UBpEomqoAprl uLoXZcCdxl2Yb0nTQay1LETxOCAtVpeMFV7XQ7MEGu8ZbZ9dOEUcb9lzxnlIK01r/lSV KCaRxXRZbaeBqhnslJu18mCZ9ZY7VPVMZzYazNzsoJwPHwgL3OEMqBjFP6we0J1T1XTZ dzdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BykQfmtBWusm2qCg+s9Qk8SFVtttQI9wccVH5ocmm4A=; b=kn4NgOjFblvUdGP27+Qdd4huJ0BNlhMovAyLqZ9DW7ZIwAn7QpfBF0O7Id7SknCfKP VR9sEICYcNi5OihlA+ykjzLBh3LydwaozUP0xwVDNYKUEs6mp4szT6JdyHF0F1MNtpG4 CEbVA7XT0QXmzi+vCDtYvUnl7b64mq40bpHGr6Hmzk3iDe+1ULm2rnI45m7gfpGGZfBf miVEXeSvTIFAwhLV1q35Rypvf995cW3uckKTUi09nTWazF7aKZcCAUzr89FJ7GwCi+1z haJ6XkkbiGE/qypx9PPQh5uCJ7hpLTntF0inMNFBQ1QpKdwVgg1bzmCA4gkfJVU6txOE EZ9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWrBGCvjB/p7JgvxEeTNDlcwL7iJTEHTGy7NZbn5RBN5igKly+R Zom9cRXobIS4u7MpcYskOasHZB/iuxhWbU9nKX2P
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJDb9Z9Dolq9uuggDfuBYKw5tpl6t5+/Diea7g3nQeI8N1yzrursMkbLboLcNr+KVRIejZfHGlSbmxT5pbN9M=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:bb18:: with SMTP id m24mr26098994vsn.92.1576016133176; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:15:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwacbAT04tckpPcRcnOt=1QByOBeJ7uDf6rNK6NRwtxZYg@mail.gmail.com> <ffa2bf72-3024-237b-86ae-9cc04babeec6@gmail.com> <74a0ea49-7a46-4eb6-c297-cd703f63bd1b@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbp2hNrgF_xxhKRRODQ6HP=U5_K-r3Wtm1wJZOZcKup3g@mail.gmail.com> <9DE9E7DC-FE60-4952-8595-B2D087A6B780@kitterman.com> <CADyWQ+GSP0K=Ci22ouE6AvdqCDGgUAg3jZHBOg3EwCmw=QG84A@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1obn55Y2=CuEYRYCEO3TYYNhYTsdkesQ67O61jRyfO=wA@mail.gmail.com> <79b1cbe6-8a53-9157-63de-210fd2bad89a@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwZnomZJTbFB=dfFdw2vWg7B0ObRuoage3pcWaYmP9Kp4A@mail.gmail.com> <082f2102-693c-136d-874c-1182f12a6818@gmail.com> <CABa8R6vV3=mONXUehda_6C616CyEXPRjceSN8T+DcPmLQwcXOA@mail.gmail.com> <ca44b693-8485-85fa-272e-206f09248098@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ca44b693-8485-85fa-272e-206f09248098@gmail.com>
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:15:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CABa8R6usZfq-eeF4iH4ZxBeyP3sOsk0L285M4251UZE_K+wnpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7cb43059960d94d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9o4FkpFMtwltXGuPR4bWlpt7aOA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:15:36 -0000

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:33 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>; wrote:

> On 12/9/2019 4:41 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
>
> I mean, the PSL is already a maintained object.  Is this new detail
> something
> that has different ownership/privacy/etc concerns than the existing
> details?
>
> So, ummm, you want to replace one problematic operation with another?
>
DMARC already depends on the PSL, so an extension that also depends on it
doesn't seem out of place.

> On the consumption side, I've only heard comments that the PSL has
> problems.  On the provision side, I've heard vigorous and repeated claims
> of overwork of the the volunteer force, sufficient that there is no
> bandwidth for dealing with revision/replacement efforts.
>
Understandable.

Brandon