IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Sat, 23 January 2021 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B15A3A15F1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ueCZcIlY0e8E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA19B3A15EC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id n2so14960535iom.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=67R968Fo03106ubNP/Lyvw0+C+MwPryotAh3qv2o+h4=; b=ICqhDaCsXKf08P9PjBo/2p3MNFnJO0JCdGNPlrF9Wu5O7TLfQAuYk5OuWctBWdciCx 23GJR1c3ZTDG2UHb0mrvbaievCHlfJVzRGdpbdFVMmRhDHJ673rdbtgRyhrnLDt87hur bx3hRq59k/VVwkxdTMjp1BPimCwGYw3V1jQjA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=67R968Fo03106ubNP/Lyvw0+C+MwPryotAh3qv2o+h4=; b=LR51XEdjxnpjJRu8BporCVqQDubQnW9j6VQLkvEhQuynvTqGzht188PRo6Dn5PfRF9 aAhjTATf/DVvh88R4U3mdzG7oNhpNnzSsFEC0W5Tu39N0uzUsjg0JiM34YAp2k/Gsteu Hlg8rbVMTNhHH7grZbHRPPOey2/DLmkjZNsm873N7baTylBC2POqkzJn2TXafZH3QWNV TTNPAwoD7Hlkf3aTZocyDNlFHA2j7yadNLTduO0zebD44POUsFHMNjct4DksrDjjLsuP q6jFC5xIQZD57efOJN6OaHY1nxIpdp1cFS8SPVCzx8FY3cPdoZz89eBlIDbmBG+v8+Xf +jZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bljYGI2tX0JDWtb0JaMXwA/5dZf3AbXMr5nxg/TcZuFe0ReEL 5iBWZ6c6ABk5BDK5E15oo0mZl+qc75buU5SsdkC1gw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2NFOQ0t2uk7LfT8nuXV65HmyoW3RrBAiZv8+6gP965ihzPapuUhdp/N/M+oz+lPqGD0S0ZHSM08qEdUeoVVU=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:d06:: with SMTP id 6mr952386jax.111.1611363518209; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+Fb93SkiAnL4cuCfxC5Wi1ERLeKhguWqAp3j8YEa6JBSA@mail.gmail.com> <87ima4wu3s.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAL0qLwbiOrgsEjZU_V6W8e42SRNoUh7CzyngRMR5RLeQpzrxaQ@mail.gmail.com> <44eec884-a3c7-f0e3-4545-1032369ad3fd@tana.it> <CAL0qLwavpE9r6+O+Dm5EyDYzP9_pTpTbbjMzL1mPTyJky5CKmA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hn5G_WSHjrD3gLL5HwZxDGoV_wxgAuiPc_sutQ4OYhNg@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1oxkNUB_E8Q5do5xCruxXGvqY2461u0ZMZ1J5BFE8dTqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwb9RUBTTfwNNLn+do1iNE-A1Ke-NcW+SidqhJqd3BdPig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb9RUBTTfwNNLn+do1iNE-A1Ke-NcW+SidqhJqd3BdPig@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:58:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qLPkVQFDxUKXsgzqoK4Qcd7Rn5Q4bOed_4WkVv-FuB7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001b762505b986ceb8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9uAd-uUgdbE7u70VX2D5qqLZP94>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 00:58:41 -0000

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 4:57 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 4:55 PM Kurt Andersen (b) <kboth@drkurt.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:06 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Here's the paragraph in question
>>>
>>>      <t>To determine the organizational domain for a message under
>>> evaluation,
>>>         and thus where to look for a policy statement, DMARC makes use
>>> of a Public Suffix
>>>         List. The process for doing this can be found in Section 3.2 of
>>> the DMARC
>>>         specification.</t>
>>>
>>
>> The concern that I have with this wording is that it is (potentially)
>> misleading. "How" DMARC determines the org domain does not matter at all to
>> this spec. The important point is that we go to "org-1" in the tree for
>> this extra lookup.
>>
>
> This is just establishing context for why we're doing what the rest of the
> document says (i.e., what problem we're solving).  Leaving this out seems
> to me to paint an incomplete picture; Section 3 basically describes a
> delta, but a delta to what?
>

And if DMARC changes how it determines the org domain, where does that
leave this spec?

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email