IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 23 December 2020 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB0B3A0E6D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:51:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jiJtwjDaAyxU for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe33.google.com (mail-vs1-xe33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A60E3A0E6C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe33.google.com with SMTP id b23so479265vsp.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:51:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yh5JOp2xG6NBUFd/MGV/sRi+CHXKij+vlBjtLUooDvw=; b=VZG3I8hC8wRBfDHPc9mGI3vtb8/z4RlEz8osQISY4hxaL07XdGlUSZhjHg3AshtD37 fFUE6oHd+fGsDIs2yCrJVTQCTEwe5c1TR77Ld0u/sPMFD+Gg28fl0tfCOOUNJsk5wyk1 vuWcqU5cGfJTTBwTBdfGQE/bfu+bk7xbgljEZrwwpau+pkLKRXsISF6Y3ucLc/u1Ya0m hh22oX5yjv16eVm3DnN5tPYsZFwlIY06QibRk+nrQM+0cVUCDftopPgcK/0rkpSsTIpB BOFG2yeIjAZ9eKuFpRlHn6H8NpKwH14RuP9l1aVittIJXwLzKGeT54VXU+OXwWOoYt3B rg3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yh5JOp2xG6NBUFd/MGV/sRi+CHXKij+vlBjtLUooDvw=; b=dEZqmALIPMUMpw2PDPZbkePeLZYXNadnF1m5LkraPYG+7UfWiKafd752GxgrQyk0Ww gtzWLGiw/JGBbokAQ9NaLnvjWtdbgvNqok3LjS8tVKa4ybFcaGhzfv+GM0fzB25xAVpk 5fibGTXPnoOT7LyqOv9MmBJucJYgseGwj67pdVL2Lbs3oEFVdbTQWwoCA01DAhnsS/Ul jV6FvqwZf74A8xClu/Di8hthRwSsQNFPlozugigE+FQq+T+22qI+o78aDgaA1BDnNTfY ld/MopYHboQXf6Prd91ukU5yfPJfl3DZWrjAGs2+Ky306hgpCZeglCxwbdXGeq/rY14o Nu+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530H/67PaFfA4i1HSnvT/k5NJJFPMSxos1FPJdq3jbhZbV0CETNL olJbRljN62rs0oAYlkjQ7VNlDPHfk4r0S/4zLG8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuASbRaqSXfdFaaZSP2czFWJ24jQ8EhBiFs0YJxIJvAQ9G/4L5S8TlTeFKsMRyxaYN7encLV8V1mG1OMUY4ms=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f14f:: with SMTP id t15mr20583375vsm.0.1608760314356; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:51:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <4a43ffaa-3987-c892-cce7-56f18888cdf5@tana.it> <39125012-e356-d62d-36fd-a7ff25a9f59f@taugh.com> <e6880ba9-f5f3-1050-25c0-658551187512@tana.it> <6bba023-d3d9-63a5-8441-11dac9a05e28@taugh.com> <74051a64-871a-db72-b5d9-1be374e23015@tana.it> <a323077-9b64-555b-3561-62cdc93819fd@taugh.com> <a8281e16-9417-5189-df73-79ea0a865fbd@tana.it> <c713b9ae-a364-1ae0-e79-55f61624aa3d@taugh.com> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwYDeV9CmFg9qCCGPse00JV30WRiSC4orC-EitK=hiahgA@mail.gmail.com> <a79dd75-4d73-d1dc-d6b1-272de866b950@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <a79dd75-4d73-d1dc-d6b1-272de866b950@taugh.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:51:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZXu3FxH7QGBS7PGbeDwfDTGmC=rbPEQidVV4eDJNHLUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010e64105b728b36d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9uxH1cq23QqDntNIA8LT5TKQuww>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:51:57 -0000

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:08 PM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> > Failing that, I have another proposal to consider that might aid us in
> > shipping a standards track DMARC sooner: Remove any and all mention of
> > failure reports, and do all that in a later add-on document as was done
> > with RFC 6651.
>
> Given how marginal failure reports have turned out to be, that doesn't
> seem like a great use of our time.
>

Well the "Remove" part was the key to getting us unstuck if this turns out
to be a pain point, if they are indeed marginal and seldom used.  So stick
a "maybe" before "do".

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email