Re: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5D3120445 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KcfMrpdYgkcY for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C7B12042F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id t28so85965477lje.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B6cipz3Awm872bPOTcktpR/ugSOGZppyctJHuVnGbDY=; b=Oc7048JXP0dv+01PtpsgngQkzUb3rEuHVOXlcjYBPeQejrMPP/VsY/Q+UcFVekN1iA 17fySAIesOoYU76buGOc19LaoJAV8EQOFzhddWKmkgV1WasosFBupmSBSHdKHl/y7eOA 60nmjGPaiKa0AlaD1lcFZp3r0NKZC8K0iwAunvpOhIQ7mppFxTeBDFszS5I6P8nGUDkb 3rEIy8mqIpt1BcZ+dpJwAIku+Iuphq8QfA1naTJ2A3VljVbpJju7C8uvrbCa0KuxAvj/ ezA4UbGefxq3NrWgpiZAgSEQdlIzpRhYifO4egfm9EodgSkt8sNvPZlgsCzeNexB9aaa luJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B6cipz3Awm872bPOTcktpR/ugSOGZppyctJHuVnGbDY=; b=GJn5QSWUw1ZGtiK2wT22LZcO4VD45ZYMDwfruy+RGhmA1HNbf6mfbE9v3mzyvUBya5 5XmsoxoQn+q1TOZSAazSjVkc4PBe/KK6JHdodYFEaJGlCIv/2rzz1ASdp8I1aogZrmaf 9iskOrs4RgvwHxQfm+V1HpS2DRHlKIFv4yGBjHG1w/G6czeiKldhHCgEGmBmzVmdEIFL hpHhldowuL+RqdesNtRmg5HPrxGea2d2aUgs1g/ItqM3ss8AfV7yLRq+qZBK7awipnLe edVDL//7wOKGAmdnHwO0ak2hWvslK0fAm3lKUdG6XMDEDT6w5iTOnSzzsNYETPoe0WrP eing==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWt/XgzLYQRvXyEzIpinwTlnqzlH55ds0CS7UYsaiDRURuEk+1q Xh0jxIaSqaDs6AVO5REMVyel42iaxmr/R/mcvAc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzUGO1VaY6KxqjKQ+LUckwDiG9fiCla8peGHpzfted3Cc2u+wUiBC3t3ZUhN1Q5q/F3sxzkheiMzVGuJU/Baxg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:870f:: with SMTP id m15mr5276446lji.223.1565193306629; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <016301d54d26$88020f30$98062d90$@leemankuiper.nl>
In-Reply-To: <016301d54d26$88020f30$98062d90$@leemankuiper.nl>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:54:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb7+ev8Z51syh5EgO0-4Kf0g8JoYHX67G_=Jps_UmrKeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Freddie Leeman <freddie=40leemankuiper.nl@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000be9e9058f88f700"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/A1d-TnZCYbOG1Iuvcl0sUn48uqM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:55:14 -0000

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:46 AM Freddie Leeman <freddie=
40leemankuiper.nl@dmarc.ietf.org>; wrote:

> I've been digging through the DMARC pre-IETF drafts and IETF drafts and
> came to the following conclusion:
>

Seems to me the working group has a choice to make here, somewhere between
"reinforce the XML specification as published" and "take the consensus of
what's implemented and publish that as the revised standard".  Either way,
this should certainly be a work item for standards track DMARC.

-MSK