IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ED13A13B2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ZLBjT9ciS4w for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB62D3A13EF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id o17so8261010lfg.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:01:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KOxE/44ALdGznt/qR0KialiYzZ/LELa/mGYrEnR/ozQ=; b=OfRt/MbHrPt9eD22ofIhI8LhLdjwO+NG0MaYxwyY2WOnNrKpaLWJsPiSrLjx33EIaR 8PST2jXTMxxO4rlCaV0j7C6UtyMkbnuTAJy3APzF/u6vjqn87xKYBjkLsJOUiifoVIiB UcT+Oty3ftlGsVBHGkPwBBEDGRJZ9I01ajMVA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KOxE/44ALdGznt/qR0KialiYzZ/LELa/mGYrEnR/ozQ=; b=HMHo7W5OmP2b1bwq3h0aQpOlms7fMyXiJzTYTsXQIeEIfm9tTlpFIpAXeMmgfnzguK NfAr7pL0XEgrmDFUzFO2904hWjkCahjQMZ0q5PeUn+xzAzS5JuNpJMDzILG2wHbcyXV+ /ElX26JXxuVb+NSNsU1L+sjaTE6PupKFiVeYFU1AD7xbSdg3nSIuQlnGa8jAssTmhkza gXB5pXohiAVS9cHiBa8I03mctMi/G9wK4OQccPV9NhFgFrZNm2UmjZS6+lI55ZLK+dWc 6ZgeILz4J+Ye35K+avyTRnwIeQO4EY8L/txuhShxecHmUWki0QoLPA3YLFnAo+IXE/cF QqQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kvoJgJtvP+45vgVjvzn9BuNoeC/mjbcRdvMBrfms/uXjtlQkO LBfSC4S576W7wvh7nPXX1MlOihWmensfK5kb2wgU8g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBANwSmw98uo7Nc4wmwDc/3K0cmEBl4VfHUCHrTUKRBbe3lEekzb/iTDdStch07r2s9/MM8SfZHz6q4Mq6JFo=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:5602:: with SMTP id k2mr3954209lfb.359.1607652094055; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:01:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <923de33f-3707-facf-389e-371f6ee64008@gmail.com> <16B0B820-7080-4937-8642-3A6B84B441AA@gmail.com> <c1a8c519-8d2e-f287-48d1-00ac74d22b49@gmail.com> <CABuGu1rCHRofp+M7uQXhEYuTLJiL94nwY-9icwQrNiLiA=anaQ@mail.gmail.com> <1f5b3e62-e6f4-0bc2-221e-362667536727@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1f5b3e62-e6f4-0bc2-221e-362667536727@gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:01:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1pC3FyMKi-6UZJTNUvGXF9u5qX84fUm=OzKvYcO-gRYsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd391605b626ab18"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/A46HnyF-MG99J3gzMLd4UJnoVtw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:01:50 -0000

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 5:03 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12/10/2020 4:46 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>
> to quibble with the "*unauthorized use*"  situation. This situation
> devolves into use-as-imagined vs. use-as-really-used when one considers
> various intermediary scenarios.
>
> (to respond to the content...)
>
> So, the driving issue is that it's characterizing problematic usage; use
> that did not achieve a DMARC pass.
>
> And, yeah, that doesn't mean the use was unauthorized, given the other
> possible explanations for failure.
>
> So, without suggesting a label, I'd describe this factor as "how serious
> is a failure to get a DMARC pass"?  If that's the right semantic, what's a
> reasonable label to use?  If it's not the right semantic, what is?
>
I think that is much closer to the right semantic but highlights a problem
that the mail coming from a particular domain probably doesn't rate a
single broad-brush characterization of seriousness.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email