IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (Limits on recipients per report) - With Interim Notes

Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> Sat, 29 May 2021 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <smj@crash.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38D13A3C7B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=crash.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20KH33ySiKBF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from segv.crash.com (segv.crash.com [IPv6:2001:470:1:1e9::4415]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37A673A3C81 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shiny.crash.com (192-184-141-33.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net [192.184.141.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by segv.crash.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/cci-colo-1.16) with ESMTPSA id 14T0V9Lm064866 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 May 2021 00:31:17 GMT (envelope-from smj@crash.com)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 segv.crash.com 14T0V9Lm064866
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crash.com; s=201506-2k; t=1622248279; bh=FyJFx0oDsLX0L+bV4Z0hWB1FpsHrTsZK/R/bODJ6dy0=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=oJ5qGdqJ6+y82CaUwJ5cy1p7Woij2e2KpIh2sHSo4zNqhi0HYYDSXAPoqVYGsnmzr tV0H337AwamLWDRTYp5hckhxXWWv0MhX6dNOZek027pRlt0Em1qo237bWzXcrUvn0A 3b7Pyf+LYrpE+ZufXbLwJLn7BrtzOe4taTyvS9lxBTZLM4LrQxoawagLw9KW48YTSB XdT+fSFRL+mWCugJ+9MW1R5taim3V+TZj+XCayCKv3Q7oGyPdZY+GsFuT1Vc9JoXL5 nCxsZc+iz9KhvFPBpMRKqsObsQcfGSZvcoh4OT0an6IaPTkgXd/UhJSZarygT45B7i yTr1iVNejV95Q==
X-Authentication-Warning: segv.crash.com: Host 192-184-141-33.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net [192.184.141.33] claimed to be shiny.crash.com
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAHej_8nmJCVwaTxVHdFL8j65ZcWd6B5f7qKQsvfY4eUoe_exrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com>
Message-ID: <a17a4c1e-a66e-e7f0-ef81-98e2947df6f9@crash.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:31:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8nmJCVwaTxVHdFL8j65ZcWd6B5f7qKQsvfY4eUoe_exrA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------026F4B4C3DE69EFED8EEAA21"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (segv.crash.com [72.52.75.15]); Sat, 29 May 2021 00:31:18 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/AG4jU-isR13sW_T9t132sK-YJK4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (Limits on recipients per report) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 00:59:15 -0000

On 5/28/21 08:46, Todd Herr wrote:
>
> Consensus on Ticket #54 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/54>
> (Remove or expand limits on number of recipients per report) was
> reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to update the text in the
> DMARC URIs section to read:
>
>     The place such URIs are specified (see Section 6.3
>     <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-01.html#general-record-format>)
>     allows a list of these to be provided. The list of URIs is
>     separated by commas (ASCII 0x2c). A report SHOULD be sent to each
>     listed URI provided in the DMARC record.
>
> This proposed change will be made in the next version of dmarcbis,
> scheduled for release in the next few weeks.


I support the change.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email