Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90400130E3F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:23:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iIrHeJwP1apo for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41780130E2E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q186-v6so16418365ljb.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:23:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NX9ktFAZBMWgdg3ZTFDMz8ZYXLuoibVKndpPqffB1RE=; b=dm5+sqoWBMluYAFabbghLXaYyQC0yBwNEKqUC70sp9Y8IlCp6fJOQ76yl5MSd/Kutq sUY88j6COwwSwqncPqtt/2gKnr+SQQd4ZrHxCWbxcsw+V3hQNKEEueTN/Ego5YU/MB88 7DYfKCeOCLA6mum2/EbWdQqNpqmyoWgm94Wmc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NX9ktFAZBMWgdg3ZTFDMz8ZYXLuoibVKndpPqffB1RE=; b=CR5RNKfqov07yiU25fnu2sYz+oLn5Vqv4dCGiGzEh6zWazlf8rKT82ewgbC1+6zmko /+qEvOAg99e3y2h8q57hV9l+a+pvFEp7PmpuLPOcbKbwqvFuD/F/J61K0B8F0MF6FA6+ 9taXRsp4kbIEk+FwumHjUND+3AiVXSOx7/2tJmedqYEjRiG0SqtvjeNZJLl82FmIGrj8 vh45iNkWtm77EvWUPbBDTFEf4BpDaC6gbygy0B2N5C6Kgv7CjctbNxVzZ1282IgjrO7l nL+66Zb6h5oNv/6TalPmcEtJBg8MNtGg17OdP6onItkdx/vIaeFyrQP4dSXKUt95tvJb 5Dcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIbeM3FMZu5wpGe/y1zFaOsHfmcKwRyIBm4k//KHaIxikPX0Vaq Bk4kKQ86lLHJ0yiihFag6Z57ukIjZUfvN8IOwGBYfQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5d5uFNV3CZsAM2zqzaY8y31YVaS7/HG1ztD1AULLhedrFvZjIKjjJix1RYcWEVrtek3xX7r9g58JSoDJHVEztk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:50d:: with SMTP id 13-v6mr1426548ljf.85.1541636605193; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:23:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <dee0fd86-40e3-e01d-6c70-2f467759be8b@tana.it> <93BFC1AD-9CC4-4CB4-89E1-A735AF5CD8E4@kitterman.com> <635dea71-2077-9a1a-e7a2-8594697e1068@tana.it> <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 07:23:10 +0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1pXaXioyPTV6OXD3hWBXVjt5+kk0dqaZwbDcKaU+Y6q5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000039da95057a1c3e00"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ANX7BezhJQvzO9QNTqyd_yKngEM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:23:36 -0000

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:42 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> wrote:

>
> The registry is meant to be a solution to the 'what about .com' problem
> you mention.  It's a solution, not necessarily the best or only one.
>
> I'd suggest we adopt the draft/work item and then try to figure it out.
>

+1 - this is a good problem for the WG to wrestle with; and maybe it can
solve the "PSL problem" if we can constrain the problem space to just the
DMARC issues instead of recreating the DBOUND-solve-for-all morass.

--Kurt