Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE34B120048 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:00:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ET55PZeuvj7U for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B897612003E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b8so494594oiy.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:00:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=tNn1SG8lwwyKHC9XtVbB1aK8bIgTSme9+fpZAgH2Adg=; b=bgyDHca7ehtha3foEdPuFBW6zCbpO8oApQocaH+dbkf71yoMa0uGrFzp2hLjdRD56A rz5hJnotdJLo4CZ6Nezm0jmzcuSHh04s7Aj1T/A6V/rYokToQh/32WgfLm8n1LxlQbAe mZvW9maScpKDjaSCp3FzHjW92YfXM1fQ2n5GlXRG5a1tFoJdhrvO3CCJyxHnsEzp4OfD 9NHz3sbF7P7U0howXlL7wwN0tgdgW04Q8JSYmkHuNbcUTWdODhleDG/Uv15PQgrIYFPN 9/tBVPiDtirHK15HhwKkDBn/D6HtcAxKCsl0wYKbh3p1BrdJTkgNI1LnHmjV1tfAVjTO YVNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=tNn1SG8lwwyKHC9XtVbB1aK8bIgTSme9+fpZAgH2Adg=; b=Bpq5VEnJ8+1mb4q+klb+5SO5n3EM7CpdoXWmF1QBg7k+ss6KHUE35TfEhnUdTbxEMS V5dKhVXg0x0BdeRNBpb+Hkk9/9yl739Q5Eo6H6E/PZkxDu1s3Qc+usKKzFOPIlllO7jD 1xfugYQm7r0DwU8HfiqaJcCawurvjI/C5gGUvQy7/008QkW4LTzKJjYzkW4JKP2SZBeO o5UD4ALhoSUirje66nAqBITRUI4iG7GMKYpRVMb1prVHyiyHN1hOIWU9Pz0q2KnXX+8s FdaL9eMMldgOdqQZAc4yZjGW+Q8b3oBmkL2zFoWRDW35iUojGJpGBZaXXNRI93ZcH5tI 8Qlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsElQaz7e/dKFssvc9pPUDcMBaN1zOW+i3oEYflpYw3/+eEsrs K7D+R0iMYA7pz+2HCjwd2YmPdKRr
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxFL2VFtMTuOvmOpM8uMp7cV/Hj1HmtziiiuzlU+eigTRatmAe9+upDi2ridqMkpjWtnluvvQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:682:: with SMTP id k2mr248782oig.66.1575309609536; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:918d:344a:cfb0:d1b? ([2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:918d:344a:cfb0:d1b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm25189otq.19.2019.12.02.10.00.08 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:00:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
To: dmarc-ietf <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <458060E1B9558124988A46B7@PSB> <f741b82b-3314-47e1-b0cf-ab491ffa14a6@www.fastmail.com> <2E5DE6BD20354824E99E564F@PSB> <84F1134E-5031-46BB-8C78-9E76FF971100@episteme.net> <A39990063436871E76405B96@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <79130263-06d5-6a63-e6c6-81b67695eb48@tana.it> <b18f3646-8733-f921-4e38-33543aef489f@gmail.com> <CABuGu1r6DVaK4uFgw_BTwpFAd3kN1G4fjPRw7JLCTAve=aRb5g@mail.gmail.com> <9dc4e992-db54-a9b9-edca-629e3285a1a7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d7fde86d-b981-3c73-d951-7685a495c817@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:00:05 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9dc4e992-db54-a9b9-edca-629e3285a1a7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------83ACE310754A86F8EEAA8F5F"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Afyaz0YiJ9tzsINpehFzPjBbBCc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 18:00:12 -0000

On 12/2/2019 8:29 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> It will help to have folk comment on the IETF mailing list, so that 
> Klensin's comments don't just get responses from me.


Sorry, wrong venue. The discussion is on the ietf-smtp mailing list, but 
the request for others to participate remains!


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net