Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 04 February 2020 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3A012087E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:39:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jALyItrrBpBp for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:39:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F6A120880 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id i7so16606476ilr.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:39:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kBYN46rGrHTj+GWLm/Qqzy2LRU/OJ/qf502mMD1gsGo=; b=GaLswRESdLi5D59XWD2CVvUowtSyDLk9kpOdqxg8sgUTzvXpiUXiZyCs9gCyZjGr4m ZE9b8qqPo85V0RNiVDIZ2uk90aTkIeGmc0Wq42eCkX69LG+a4d6f97qd4fr7hpCz5Bfu 9/Akh3UsHOz9TBTq5WkhkNoQMCm6OJvnqvhaE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=kBYN46rGrHTj+GWLm/Qqzy2LRU/OJ/qf502mMD1gsGo=; b=FCewtyxdKdL59tNFLQ6Z9Uk6TIBQXW57N0F8TJy6/tJOSoqVEessJ6SwYGAB+CbIiz VvrDsCTxIit5JcRQiNTUbhw//HgCK2we6JuRv/w0BBaKI+vBeIhucot5Pui6gVZK7FxI RjUElei6oaDOLtGXkSRMTSONI0ZvPhYUtiNxXhoJX89bnY418R5B85ej/jk1RJIL12IM GmYmYOY4hHPh4VdVc11LPMKGEj4P7GCoBcaSVnXtDt9hToQ9CSWnBVdtIxN9AnNNHAIA 8M5PJHMno2QoHEniyqafm9rftwRjsMrGxJocKUY6+tUm7fVkNgmaocfClm2YkWomix8j vw7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXpWyiBmfgX5MOlDYJAPorTyeTQXEi2u2tKarJRR7rcFK2316I DF0arqZq9AYA8Ke8MCcZ7YUnT+feJ3CSV/A7US3XVQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwArIDp9wZBOn8ebb3VTjgp1afJJtPJCkMg4f7HzRVI0f+j0SdmpyW/FuSCPdH2Jvy2B+6ZwmTco29WWlqtGcw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:b506:: with SMTP id f6mr22251813ile.103.1580837960153; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:39:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwacbAT04tckpPcRcnOt=1QByOBeJ7uDf6rNK6NRwtxZYg@mail.gmail.com> <ffa2bf72-3024-237b-86ae-9cc04babeec6@gmail.com> <74a0ea49-7a46-4eb6-c297-cd703f63bd1b@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbp2hNrgF_xxhKRRODQ6HP=U5_K-r3Wtm1wJZOZcKup3g@mail.gmail.com> <9DE9E7DC-FE60-4952-8595-B2D087A6B780@kitterman.com> <CADyWQ+GSP0K=Ci22ouE6AvdqCDGgUAg3jZHBOg3EwCmw=QG84A@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1obn55Y2=CuEYRYCEO3TYYNhYTsdkesQ67O61jRyfO=wA@mail.gmail.com> <79b1cbe6-8a53-9157-63de-210fd2bad89a@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwZnomZJTbFB=dfFdw2vWg7B0ObRuoage3pcWaYmP9Kp4A@mail.gmail.com> <082f2102-693c-136d-874c-1182f12a6818@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZjd2qhejctNK0BM7j=SscaE45Mm7U9iWJNvO-GuhEKQA@mail.gmail.com> <1aa141c4-50d8-4f2e-c72f-e1d0bf19f280@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY-v-VS-Wai-aqGRPOj1i8HxqMrYybzsNJGzN2dTHvG9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY-v-VS-Wai-aqGRPOj1i8HxqMrYybzsNJGzN2dTHvG9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:39:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1q+bZvSj0K4KZWdmcoD0n-GFuo=wwqm_kV=Wx-+cB_d2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000100dcd059dc38570"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Ak2Dt85D3c84O1dVta_8_juAF6M>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 17:39:23 -0000

I support publishing the I-D as confirmed in the WGLC with (perhaps) some
additional caveats regarding the ephemerality of the Experiment as deemed
necessary by the chairs.

Given the expected duration of the experiment (at least a year to collect
some useful data, if not 2-3 years), I also support unblocking the other
work in this WG since we ought not wait for this experiment to "conclude"
(whatever that means) before proceeding on other work items.

--Kurt