[dmarc-ietf] Post-WGLC revision draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-17
Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> Tue, 02 October 2018 02:42 UTC
Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53264127B92 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vDB4Xs1l0o8m for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x242.google.com (mail-lj1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9C8C127148 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x242.google.com with SMTP id f8-v6so373746ljk.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 19:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gQRt9XPqdYWkTVmzOJRraSypV65B+zfD9IaLeqPYl/M=; b=TC2P/m+UNkt+t/9dRFyYEqZO23ysq6Fl7OpeBL8WH3nIE5dvCHzuLHCoxUWSr0XHln f7wa7kobW6bwNYrvdX5h+eeTk9jcfF9kU0a/aNoluMxAncJytr39V9QjsWb0BAcJcVhY V8LZXqdCzf82RcDQyGI75GTJ5A02m5smG5Jnc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=gQRt9XPqdYWkTVmzOJRraSypV65B+zfD9IaLeqPYl/M=; b=AMaKvDHH3WZ5uvBAbHfdArf7gtcRjBDAOWxOVtuZNjqJ/xtAtPosTg8vvIORxqCPYI O2s5YN9mju/ldL8pjL7Ww3SaT3qJQ/iQnH21mhn7wFOce1gSPgvxtSyKsum9NpJZc9/w vsGs7klnBKIWMjZOACO9myGotPbxc1VW4shF2G1k5jwvc6+SPIwivQH1PK+e5lkVg6pY wHwP07s0vYNd/wGteYw5eREKt30pEU3VE8iKt6WDA1OffUa+jpA0+9XPbClgBfd0I2GF bnnPevqG5/RaelsKr8ewGYzXpRIYEPVitN56Ec2fEqH9/7esd12l8YRb95pTu6ZHjGSl IHlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojYiIGQb4nGP9lncZfbYV+hPk43jcRYuDoQ5w/z0g6rnAfrbCgj SB6m7nqNlUmgPFdjg5zYGV4CngdXvOtyDsnGWO46kvbcaOM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60QLKzB3our5HK5DP9aCB4dYaEknh0JB3x7IiidBuLknx6rdGzHCmNsQlyYHHkjUfHZl5MTgAFt6ff7TOLv1Rc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:20da:: with SMTP id g87-v6mr7012864lji.88.1538448153601; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 19:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153844774886.22393.9673808794999075654.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <182F03B8-F63E-4FE5-8C6A-E5BC2E29D003@linkedin.com>
In-Reply-To: <182F03B8-F63E-4FE5-8C6A-E5BC2E29D003@linkedin.com>
From: Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 19:42:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1ozbrNNpJiX6jqKvOJfshDiigynNOoQNVJW3NASiuWz3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b37a13057735dffb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/An4SuePP9EaW7KFw9fB2_Wb0tjk>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Post-WGLC revision draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-17
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 02:42:38 -0000
This version incorporates all of the feedback received during the WGLC with the exception of generating new examples for Appendix B. As such it should be good to progress to the next round toward the Editors' desk. Note that there is one small tweak which may cause some former implementation mismatch. When recording the sending IP address for message, we previously had tagged it as smtp.client-ip; but to clarify that this is machine to machine and not PII, the name was changed to smtp.remote-ip. Otherwise there are no substantive changes to the protocol. Following the suggestions made by Dave Crocker, I've attempted to further clarify some of the language pertaining to "authentication assessment" being the operative element being conveyed through the ARC chain of header fields. --Kurt Name: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol Revision: 17 Title: Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) Protocol Document date: 2018-10-01 Group: dmarc Pages: 38 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-17.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-17 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-17
- [dmarc-ietf] Post-WGLC revision draft-ietf-dmarc-… Kurt Andersen