IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] NXDOMAIN

Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> Fri, 09 April 2021 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A843A1396 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VT2wnLSwoxl for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92b.google.com (mail-ua1-x92b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 297F73A1395 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92b.google.com with SMTP id z23so1130365uan.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=D3QqbMLs3QlEhqZffL2KZ0jCFOuhpttUgzrpIP3L74o=; b=QhVJmjtPN29InrMKzPV0Co1Cav3PsX7gE9R1QdCDn0Xx/FYRts1FPQB8jnE7nwz+G3 3uCD7W1/bW8aaj26oiCCgXVJ7ODS0aVyDAJByHeUSbz4jYTFsMhF2F6QEvqHn6TyQoaH n1d9RCiScZK/d9WqFt6QlO06GhR5oYnMrmZMS+wzpCf5q2kdEnqLccnn+nsBDpOTsyWn o3pb0VyPnO9HoxM1Db5rFswjqDuRxGRxhA75tyQCB0V4+Lj3Q/M4qDV/GAZfrfKa2Czq x/zNK4zxkcims69BnOlMqswM2PsSj+E8pqYu3Z9JcoRm1gZ1i8+TlmN6mu44hUcZuljM Lvww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=D3QqbMLs3QlEhqZffL2KZ0jCFOuhpttUgzrpIP3L74o=; b=PfbB/k4r12QhJWQdwvFVdRhSVfvJ0zLQXqWCTPtBFXC09QzEeFi14vPotUV4ztbdbX F5qJ0uo4fvMFi/tfJmzBmkGlOE66x+IYQxtmHKYQrSQGPsCZRBho/YuKaHtxm/BW2yQg Z3hAUN+4/nZvrD+u3jNamLDcd2Od3pvlGH4lAMi7e/ok/GTQ/t+ab3EUfuqX2gGFIaGe dTG57TNFwftKzYsdp4IlXaoHN99JTEonTNoML60oEkw3PT9yf/YFPnGlYlR6xqiGjDQ3 FKQoDw2j0CXIW67GlZ76Mj0zY+lWLV2US4Op9oHF7WFNb14v6ysTasOcyFXEnmGGaUMj H6BA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IpxyLpY4IucG4GIsTJQkA9J587U68sGcQ18BbfdjwqBP3Vwyh 0STh1P5JVMyY2OK2o0qegSJYcNt7sCes7mHuYQ+tmo0h
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRqjheSujd8BybCjIDCcFdxWJuLCQYs49IrnPt+BUg/rLHtHM2SXnfiAuIA3r3PUotxv3QXUY7I9Zkd0wSjdc=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:764f:: with SMTP id s15mr12003296uaq.104.1618005959173; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwYr+w1hjV3Wez6xd96OmmXjYU3D=-4+2qfCxkQ5TVA+Ww@mail.gmail.com> <20210408182948.5E4AF7282ACE@ary.qy> <CAH48ZfxM5DgDds1-wHiXMSfSAoT3+rSL_L4wbADtLz=JQ9QU=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8kNa89c_wvo71Vd7as1SrF5xv0a78J0PVE5wyi-Ybizrg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48Zfzf1zAB0avOaVzbjm4=otkA2JjQrNekKA8mr1-CsmMgiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8kLEpLTqR+e0S94wTh=Kj0X_HTjufKKLsc4+x8Ls_gdoQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8kLEpLTqR+e0S94wTh=Kj0X_HTjufKKLsc4+x8Ls_gdoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:05:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH48ZfwddZUawaAVwKJSdMSs=V0fX=BwwUJ2fOYCMN0yzp29+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000070e9bb05bf915e44"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/B_6AC5oC2ohPiiCrBTAcvo5qlv0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] NXDOMAIN
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 22:06:06 -0000

I see no scope problem with language that states what alignments are not
acceptable, but that is the role of the chairs and the design team.

I shared what I thought was relevant and new information, and responded to
the questions that were asked.   I am going silent.


On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 11:12 AM Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 9:49 AM Douglas Foster <
> dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am happy to have the concept optimized.  Your comments make sense to me.
>>
>>   I just believe strongly that these documents teach implementers best
>> practices and that this particular document is the time and place to begin
>> teaching best practices around non-existent domains.
>>
>> It is swell that postfix is widely used and responds appropriately to
>> non-existent domains  But clearly we have a lot of implementers who need
>> coaching.
>>
>
> I don't dispute that documenting best practices is a thing to do; I just
> think that it's a thing for emailcore to do, not dmarc.
>
> Consider this paragraph from the charter for emailcore
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/emailcore/about/>:
>
> The working group will also work on an Applicability Statement in
> parallel with 5321bis and 5322bis, to capture relationships to other
> documented and widely deployed work (recommended extensions, transport
> security and other issues from the UTA working group's output, and such)
> and current email practices. 5321bis and 5322bis will be submitted for
> publication before this document is finalized, and the "bis" documents
> will have priority for the working group's attention until they are
> finished.
>
>
> I don't see similar language in the charter for this group.
>
> --
>
> *Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager
> *e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
> *m:* 703.220.4153
>
> This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
> proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
> authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
> recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
> distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
> and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
> this email and then delete it from your system.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email