Re: [dmarc-ietf] Meetecho at IETF 108

Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <smj@crash.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9484F3A0C4D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=crash.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RgEO8n9bLaYH for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from segv.crash.com (segv.crash.com [IPv6:2001:470:1:1e9::4415]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBAC3A0D56 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.10.124] (135-180-118-4.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net [135.180.118.4] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by segv.crash.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/cci-colo-1.7) with ESMTPSA id 06SEIwd8046032 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:19:07 GMT (envelope-from smj@crash.com)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 segv.crash.com 06SEIwd8046032
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crash.com; s=201506-2k; t=1595945947; bh=oQoTxL1cPUpidaaUAq1WB1nl1/jtmTQqbV7MpaZFyJo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KMYnMNy+26riQ99Lk1yC2zx9PeB83XpZQoqpSRl9mXTQ1lkJiFt34hbsynWrKzwQq 17Iw/bd+ksNBeiXVWvhHeghv5E2Bkp5DhCifi/EIX7pto+ba+ARQXQ2F5ilgOhUhoj ULjgQHILcwGqQOUSzZmJKfcOh5Wz1yQrh8nArbp9YBqFsKwkrICFqCig9xFDfV+CnR rUUR1pq0n3O+Gu3K9o3UNKWiRIX80Iwk14wuq81DwGOvSUYkoK742yVDV/C4MgsZ4H vVUNUj1arszFi8PvDNBhVZ8dwQNsLHKC3E5Kv8yyMOTs4vF2W6hYjskvYxtvle+khZ xr0rpOdhgCHPQ==
X-Authentication-Warning: segv.crash.com: Host 135-180-118-4.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net [135.180.118.4] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.10.10.124]
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwYqBExbtD-puz9Pb6ui2inMw7FOR3sYf2dap+_pZffBew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com>
Message-ID: <188ab9f5-6152-65bb-9645-d59dd7463607@crash.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:18:58 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYqBExbtD-puz9Pb6ui2inMw7FOR3sYf2dap+_pZffBew@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (segv.crash.com [72.52.75.15]); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/BfInMBS3knT6FMG4AZkXrRqhQTk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Meetecho at IETF 108
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:19:49 -0000

On 7/28/20 7:07 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> If any of those of you who participated in today's working group 
> session via the Meetecho interface have any thoughts ...  You can 
> email the list, the chairs, or me with your thoughts.


Having to flip back and forth between the chat column and the 
queue/participant column was awkward. Assuming I didn't miss a setting: 
Why can't we have both shown? At least as an option on larger 
screens/windows/devices.

--S.