IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 15 January 2021 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1186A3A0C9D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:25:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnanar1p5_eB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe30.google.com (mail-vs1-xe30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD6E3A0CA0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe30.google.com with SMTP id h18so5307957vsg.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:25:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bHrHCqQLPimxzFACYqokvHTVcHqyq5+/iUXLHMhZShM=; b=ZMGj9lbvqC0q85lqZtIfSm+McAfvlQAGMqOMpTGmj68yEQM+/BGHpmODU2NMnKzEbH 94QJGUzyvoq7PPllaoVR82mqR3MBMGPhqOKdI1WBpc0PomW/8qUmXvo2jB4cUkEN2dqy JZPCHzm1y9irGfFvq/exxJBctI8vWK7hAvC5oSBcvB1OwRlykgz6gMPSLWoPPK/r4KlQ hbBNo8il8vsDj0SGb0fp68/LDynl/G+O85WVZXEV5HPWDKuW/NWWPv3gyNA1mwEyPcG3 hGNvTsvQQUDl8BntgJZYA/tBYmvcQb5+hxl2KDOOylFWQopHNl9MXY3CQVArQUUQSM+E IKxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bHrHCqQLPimxzFACYqokvHTVcHqyq5+/iUXLHMhZShM=; b=rArCn+SSyjvpk6c99KPkMeDy5LAcyALbUvd1qACgB+5IoMR1R5X0ozimV28InP+y// F6X50U/jE3luRGkRZQPcbFvB8vD2jE2jfxugUpE5OXBulm0PBm5uWuZLupFP58gUzb8i mFwqCkrY/9+F5tSmemr4TkoJfwjjs/K5Ws1ebcOxPU9tmv6NeX8ILIMNvWaKDQlnPXU6 vxt56TceldizzPILWybIPIO12co+OuZiGBrAXPe+uEbJpFArswJl8D9/SxOGUFrtrEqR CN57vzjmtJZ6RaEm9HWbZ8BgBv5wPMj0Xr/pWUDFMb2ypUfUvAgjVSPDSer8P+Q0D0VR Uhow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316g2gUDrWPHfkV+LlXC7SmAkeqXHO/XD36S58r88yRz6aispLk YpX34DjrpMNA8hPlXkqKHfBkHqrvrOJLbETESmY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMFSPpyxfJhM6gDS7C5lj9786p9WEU0c3NVqP43yqmrJlBX4pU8+xO1BBMEuX/l8o8fWNN/9pVyPq1HcnjM9I=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:808:: with SMTP id g8mr5946291vsb.0.1610727908630; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:25:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwaZx97cztehz_o=cCVZRbEP_yFVS9hTqWDKg7cMgjNvFg@mail.gmail.com> <9b68024a-f538-af7a-3a9b-e2ad2657ce9b@crash.com> <621d4aa5a72baf46b45a005f8e45eab6f7421e50.camel@aegee.org> <CAL0qLwa2Xy-aM_p1ebmHfOvPfo8SKeivMjp4qQSh_AyXHWr=-w@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1oK+4xHjs-o0i617MGxuGaQVmrR-3_Tfrec=_1BWz5NRg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1oK+4xHjs-o0i617MGxuGaQVmrR-3_Tfrec=_1BWz5NRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:24:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbeR_HGY9kFc9WxqnfCOqatmPKtdaT2x-LSsrAuxNMRgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Cc: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2e37705b8f2d071"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Bilp87WnnITEqFBY7fgqdWIMhec>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:25:11 -0000

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:51 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <kboth@drkurt.com> wrote:

> I thought that we discussed that ticket and decided that the incidence of
> problems was low enough to warrant a "WONT FIX" determination.
>
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/?gbt=1&index=W3uGPEpT3Yi5lqKntZXyL8jkNjk
>

We did, and if it had only ever come up exactly once, I might think nothing
of it.  But here it is again.  Now I'm inclined to think where there's
smoke there's fire, and this might require more consideration.

-MSK, participating

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email