Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 29 January 2021 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F063A1117 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:21:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35WlIdwpNeSO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A2FD3A1115 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id 16so9866055ioz.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:21:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MeJNXhYCo/v0LL7BQJ9ez9CqmVkaulCCcRJlDb8/kIg=; b=W/Xtc7e3AC0tHeeVKz+5MDVwfFzItDwSHY2eg0n4FfdUIN0AnUlCsNEBzYbZgKpLIJ Ei1D3vL0WZmrzFEU7qVtAQbW1128erH77YGtl19klInGrTDTiMiHj/2kCy5UpwDLwXyD +Sa6IeljDDuKbVQ3TiGBSat2Cfy/b11ZTdUT8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MeJNXhYCo/v0LL7BQJ9ez9CqmVkaulCCcRJlDb8/kIg=; b=CPW4wu8lA9sWjwcDInqUepSOUgEGSw02ZTSXUrNGQOLc/6nmZZrOA9XKjkdV2c3R0R id1drEyMUa+Y9rPNGyara4LwqnYHut9wYVpPjeiuLZivIzxN2PhDZKdaZesfbhNGalIs QteE2C83fXUo5mO/7fJyV6xkx1l5zrB9Sd5BjEfc4qmavipbhNicEvCHFdBkv4aaiRJQ dIk8IgrNUZOFmW3t+88xZ2On5U9W86ZnB2fX9xxcfwo81GFkMGIAs4ssZzXe1NFXarMx PA3HB7gKcNmqXZYN1r+++psTZSVfxlhPRvDQUgwA7qIkU3lPeCoOfnXACDIibDisZCXc R0FQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gqga5oW17EOXE2eSRCo83bGVHjLXpayLtwif/gMYSEW3Byv8W 36/rQ9dzoUfo2ksFV7TePLO8BHoKJyhJ7Ydz/1bTFA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhpVbNC4t+78X3V8edoHvGyqr/qi+M0v+MOxE6FAsJd8u479hmQhIYAjUv+OcPvsDe0XZOUMAH59WqHoxNsOg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:712e:: with SMTP id n46mr4285181jac.19.1611937298412; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:21:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+Fb93SkiAnL4cuCfxC5Wi1ERLeKhguWqAp3j8YEa6JBSA@mail.gmail.com> <87ima4wu3s.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAL0qLwbiOrgsEjZU_V6W8e42SRNoUh7CzyngRMR5RLeQpzrxaQ@mail.gmail.com> <44eec884-a3c7-f0e3-4545-1032369ad3fd@tana.it> <CAL0qLwavpE9r6+O+Dm5EyDYzP9_pTpTbbjMzL1mPTyJky5CKmA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hn5G_WSHjrD3gLL5HwZxDGoV_wxgAuiPc_sutQ4OYhNg@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1oxkNUB_E8Q5do5xCruxXGvqY2461u0ZMZ1J5BFE8dTqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwb9RUBTTfwNNLn+do1iNE-A1Ke-NcW+SidqhJqd3BdPig@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1qLPkVQFDxUKXsgzqoK4Qcd7Rn5Q4bOed_4WkVv-FuB7w@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+FejAGbv8TLrGXpV_Crgi1KErKK_1-6=2jzZh+QbguK6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYrXEaOVphUjAB1guQO=s+ppabP1q4Ne16rqF=e6JsqLw@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Fx-jVGGgzf6-R6n1OzpwQR3akFJeVNqmq=XN_X=1B-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Fx-jVGGgzf6-R6n1OzpwQR3akFJeVNqmq=XN_X=1B-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:21:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qj0Q5M9bbeUvxRb2ubSKZea+sPd-2Jv+8uYf2VaVfwhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001291df05ba0c66e5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/BlcKSpasvJfm91yGBhhmtlrQqyw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:21:41 -0000

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I suggest adding it to this paragraph:
>
>    This document specifies experimental updates to the DMARC and PSL
>    algorithm cited above, in an attempt to mitigate this abuse.
>

update to DMARC = yes; update to PSL = no


> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:44 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 5:01 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since this is an experiment, Appendix A discusses the updates that
>>> happen.  we don't actually say explicitly "if the experiment is a success,
>>> the following changes will be made" and perhaps I should add some wording
>>> like that.
>>>
>>
>> Something like this, perhaps?
>>
>> "A standards track update to [RFC7489] will take into account the results
>> of this experiment."
>>
>> ... somewhere in Section 1.
>>
>
A normative dependency from an experimental spec imposed upon a standards
track spec seems like a bad idea to me. At the very least it would impose a
timing constraint that DMARCbis could not be "completed" until after the
PSD experiment is "completed", analyzed and consensus achieved.

--Kurt