Re: [dmarc-ietf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C887C3A15BE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7SNvcZr5XWCR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE20D3A1765 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id w2so3147255oic.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sej0Zj/72Lx87ZDm8Dr74F5AfrRl/dM+A9vBpYPtPgA=; b=ftRKrHx85JkmaNsMeNM8N7u+/ww/IRhykA7PecIsXf3N7hvSfwCORHU4ILJ5pY3Foh lYmZ4FPCkpMvbjlPMXxgZBL3QAFnJg5EE7bDcsCAQleKxWnOJF8c6CJwL7udLCONNxz1 AhNjpPFPFz9S08MIP/02k5YMW7y0zL75lTdM938vUDqgPAobE9+83GHeXUMdf3SuZdph lLtDgbtQRdVjx/P4Dn7jSRqxVzQIfYPuvupyMQ1Oix5r9Q8jkqIKr7wJxMHf9zlgGsSm G9FlOXDY0suc2w7VOrxE2K7ibaAbn7SfBvpQ+liytLEKHVRCQerbLuyH/3M36mN7U6Jg 4xFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sej0Zj/72Lx87ZDm8Dr74F5AfrRl/dM+A9vBpYPtPgA=; b=Y4X2q7cVUQY6eEu1OgBVyrl0NTRZqhLarkIxUxP6J1T+BtRx5EZ9LA6yu2GzE0yI1e Mgs4hgnfzubxQf7wX/iNu7XbLGBzqjiMugFMEiHupy0JHRFL7BW3/DYpSQCwCU/ijNGF IU5K6GNsPgLbE296fexWWlccjueVd1S/MrJsQB+nlKDryIhLvxVuAcrVjLezULl8kzqb ajs7Eh57NtJjUzzi3icB1mxMu50a5qke7gq+uU4yIUx193PLnqYRY2M8Z3V0WPuu/KHY z5SesvbtO1sG07vqVckW/+MtbRT6SfGLNjULGy6Iml71gauF02bwAhOXaNfyuxytI7za iLsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubqngoXKitWgeEt5SM2gh/mp0cPIkFfn2M7fKZd6bPmz0CY2bec 2D/Q3d3lAA6hJcDvxDk1WN9u2rvjOKsSD1B/CtY9LA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL0RaBGOV6TR9HM3DGGNZuZ6YFsvr2ipFjLhfyKo821y9HWx50pe+I6M/Cm/13LSG6bAXbzbciVM+QFwx8sc1k=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4fc3:: with SMTP id d186mr2501365oib.171.1585841626419; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158572481464.30894.8037097234628362447@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbU9U7m=+DYMu8Zbe9iviAWDPdJq0dCoaRGzKxHF+ANJA@mail.gmail.com> <2100110.1RVLOuU0sI@sk-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <2100110.1RVLOuU0sI@sk-desktop>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:33:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WO_bdq6QLp7dyc6MmL_FKVN69BGJ01zAE47ncPULaPGSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, last-call@ietf.org, ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dmarc-psd.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1176805a2508637"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/BwAFcdDl9Jd1zQJDhzk7w8zF_Q4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:34:15 -0000

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 3:21 AM Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> wrote:

> That's my thought.  I'll wait for the co-chairs before taking any actions
> to
> update the draft.
>

Scott, please prepare a new version of the I-D based upon your comments,
but don't post it until IETF Last Call finishes and all other feedback, if
any, has been folded in.

Seth, as co-Chair