IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] https reports, or nits in draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 08 May 2021 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27263A0BF5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVvGuTNvSdwR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa34.google.com (mail-vk1-xa34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12EA33A0BF3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa34.google.com with SMTP id v188so1025933vkf.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 08 May 2021 11:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WLsvqbO6ahMLlT8y6o6IWyyloEPym+9jwBILFKgj6m4=; b=lHOhG+tx9ozZuSYEws6l2BS9u26x8znao3ruWD11QMki8ZTM8Wb+YX3JxTGjoSw3jY 3VKzc+nN0Y6x5YTB0K2PQZ2M//ORgVIPexTrjmHXeO6kAC6+bUySBEXYP6Ly1mv6w6F3 9SJ6r7LAtZyJLLaiYVL+dYjRVW0dSAiiW2OSvxBfIMQYyDJYvyayKn+o24TuHy+6CjVR GEU9kZSYg0gz7c5iaKkpmFeC8eqwZ1o4jGacfzQBr6S+TksacvTM36ItrjYuH1PEuHYJ Q6EaKmLwyFol6Kvc3BUgIJCUL8J/xQuqwVbG30ChzKv4DcU0Qb3mz/7aux0738YKPdY2 AINw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WLsvqbO6ahMLlT8y6o6IWyyloEPym+9jwBILFKgj6m4=; b=SDstrpqEwuyCYJLBsA5N5ehIVZDKPtUoeexX6ydR/5qof2w7u7FSJ60kPybDdAgHiI 51Xvikgk3L7MGIsE9qYS/hC5SbT2sG0sdJ+lPb8ungmReKRnnIqXHSn1C4hUf2JFC1LL BZYrM+hglZRSL+cfZ/jjTzeuDLVxHtu+CIHy/D6yxR7cNTBChkxmpXktMayxJXGqs55U b4Asy0fVy7xJu/e76KWckd6NAG6q1rOrPE9SKHxbz3ZoT1Q4+cihztvp9cCx+5aid06D I69OAFrqyJhLcy9GdyuN4KbhaEOZJ4SYxjTPlUIVCgSOcAxtZD368p0r1aZsORXJxf0e f/PQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530w3GvF3gXKuWsDK5NDujinYlxTt9UHRcjwGxP4jPOCiojqPj0i +VVTG4/C7KSmFN3/dBmbUSVDkuFhM6cKzy5lOfq4ACgDSKE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3Dt2kM81m7JmUMZINIZUYnkmHesk61l1fMhkeL37BF75I0m1UaP5MYFxE+vIC/XQj9WszKEgL2GYR4VX2Xgk=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:bf83:: with SMTP id p125mr12476849vkf.14.1620497636436; Sat, 08 May 2021 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB4351736953B3058184CC7991F7579@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20210507164115.462AE720C41@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwaa+AECxVwTgQs9=HBPxEb072eb41QmsULaLwGsTHS-qw@mail.gmail.com> <6c22e275-b72e-112-7646-96531e20da32@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <6c22e275-b72e-112-7646-96531e20da32@taugh.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 11:13:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwabZa22-rKso24ycyx6NGoq1iLn-_NH1NmeSkTXnaHL-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fab03c05c1d5813b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/C4QfTxZGWi80kmYb-J3USzgYhak>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] https reports, or nits in draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 18:14:03 -0000

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:22 PM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 7 May 2021, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > [ mail and web departments don't talk to each other ]
> > If that logic also holds for mail people and web people,
> > I imagine the lack of interest here has a similar basis; we're talking
> > about standing up a whole service or endpoint here, not just adding
> records
> > to a zone file.
>
> That's true but there's also the fact that a handful of analysis services
> like dmarcian and valimail collect a large fraction of DMARC reports.  If
> a few of them were interested in https reports, it'd be worth adding.
>

Ah, that's a good point.

I think both of them are represented here, and maybe some other report
processors.  Any feedback on this from them?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email