IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] reporting documents, Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 28 December 2020 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9693A0C90 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:06:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=sFQNSYZC; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=j+tj+W8R
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_CV8-_J4z82 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:06:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264533A0C8A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 73507 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2020 17:06:19 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=11f1b.5fea108b.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=N7PO/vyJtHVbHsO979ZTQZH4agZLYeflKvFpFUp92Iw=; b=sFQNSYZCxrAt3A6oS7Cq2Hmxbr15nzgkUq4WnqMLph3WOw2LvYZbbmXkADYQE8r8qrWW9EZ0IQCpflwanzegoo3lFW9nJ3hkiNorzHG80ifV0j12TvbWsUXGCNEK5m+Yh8M8tj9Eke+GdUVae9n8+qOnb4BfCOwDM63j9ylXZRYzs06kn/ydPD8MPVAGpugotGIzdSV76MlSF8/5DAU976bm/jStfGFezjJOwVFmAxy8mgb1VL4rRcuAZheTNVNWbNPXI2IA8osI1+5FheBv44BGSNtmIVQ5Jp4U1duWnE6UeLWsZ0DmaOmF0FtntYzFWM6nVTIFsVd0F0DN5dcj0A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=11f1b.5fea108b.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=N7PO/vyJtHVbHsO979ZTQZH4agZLYeflKvFpFUp92Iw=; b=j+tj+W8R4aR06EqtXITTfWqiwt/kC7sOK9LLylRt47HrzSMtuGeGmVu3kiBjkO/ARULzAzB0uyM418wZqyrBhG6Yp6xGjVrqEzuY2e74G4n5ncOR17/YtTqQWh9vR0EGGuZejKR6J8kn8WQFCGobru8hQwUtouo9iM2/Z64j7QSAGFv726NsqqYEUG7pOSZeiK7TzirJWAUOGHljfBMMR+um9ozR3gFutK+IblXnF1ro6SFZbIdOQH1hgMiSBYdE3ca3hAUYWGitJkcaYXbPgfGYmQNKENr2VkVjvUl+HHrPzhjjIFdIQ5lcrpS1iCizlTr8t/davnOpklbpW1vEOg==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 28 Dec 2020 17:06:19 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:06:18 -0500
Message-ID: <6a4a11ea-fae2-81f5-ce5f-fbd4bc1d41e2@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <01RTP8I70EYI004QVR@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwYDeV9CmFg9qCCGPse00JV30WRiSC4orC-EitK=hiahgA@mail.gmail.com> <a79dd75-4d73-d1dc-d6b1-272de866b950@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwZXu3FxH7QGBS7PGbeDwfDTGmC=rbPEQidVV4eDJNHLUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYeK2cJb+easc=mqCi4ap1932LmbDdfxM1dFZKrdo2a2mw@mail.gmail.com> <acfe3d9e-97eb-50ee-26a2-568fdd8359dd@taugh.com> <CADyWQ+GJ62jt=dL9Gzuw_O7USNbS=86BqAzu8Rdv9sCb5OpCdw@mail.gmail.com> <d4a00be5-bd61-0c05-3431-8d56b39a3550@tana.it> <8813331f-f5e4-faa5-c6d-11212fc25797@taugh.com> <5d150251-427c-5c44-a0c3-ad2e7f24b692@tana.it> <01RTP8I70EYI004QVR@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/C8LaX-eyX2sYKFLqTiIjGm3l62s>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] reporting documents, Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:06:23 -0000

On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Ned Freed wrote:
> I'm not ethusiastic about the split, but if that's what people want then so be
> it. I will say that my experience has been that doing so is usually more work
> and provides less benefit than you'd expect.

I recall agreeing to split out all of the reporting into a separate draft, 
which makes some sense so the two parts can proceed separately, but not 
further splitting aggregate and failure reports.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email