Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 18 August 2020 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2114E3A08EE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KPu1umwafO9g for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0583A08EC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com with SMTP id q200so4530253vke.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=N3enU1ojCBS+ZVIzcz/JmE+WkgEciQN+9q+lcG6uUBA=; b=BAMU5K6oGCiz3cuI7LSwrSE/DQYwcfAc7MV91S4hSyOsMVbz3C5K/AZk5xtRPaA/sd 3EqJP+DuxzlgEEWxa4malRj0Hq+w6dSJ4NAHJaK2nOat8l/ois/1CwwCTpTlKDAhG83y er8iraB+qYzKlV+wDlsQqNvvk/LgDlUNxWDEmRKM57PHr9N6xT6VFcNABURNbQSf2dNN eWC9jsR74voc3xyhkFglsAf0cg5fbCsfMxPNQUZ4LdIG/RTliywPsXtZ2c6AXVVZoCbw mYhr8TXVaVALmzL1dwtR4ISW2VfmAisU7x/+aWioKSgEbKy2ZoTF14JCYqU571D5QSoc 0qmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=N3enU1ojCBS+ZVIzcz/JmE+WkgEciQN+9q+lcG6uUBA=; b=r/vWgduhxMSTWkIewmYrV1an+2fWex99DTa/uS1sArWMnaQzfo6EM613dPwjxl43kn Oyas4m97512Lkk/cVT+yloPNBw1zLsNzXbBjDupS4GDnL4/Gcr8wug+qGz8/F0N7nbyk Ax1S6qqC4rcWpst1bGT59jJbVXsM7VeIKekdeGP6pDPyFbAhuXCUYbdLoP8Nor5US+zW 5u9UJFpnOH0MRx0IBA4kLXGBPOcF/baLG+F3jx5pHu7OC33lt0EUUoSWY4SXrk3oA3E1 nvy4jQPLZ65oAiFPdn0lp5Cuvjln9UmbXGh7K40gNqL/B/HHtAB3kcIes0znN7rtACFs us3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qk1rO5JPpxmM1wLIFv1UuvQbeEaWWGNA6GvyYLLZJClmlyzFA 6NNj8HSXuCsmiEbg6wGTkEZlShwoC7l0sSZ+s4E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwloArzlIR61Ux66YBmESN8mYHvSOnXTa9lVSb9VKtEHOamTolrQrWttT6K2DGfqOtyAbsGdky2UosdJ7nw4ug=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:f8c5:: with SMTP id w188mr12188833vkh.15.1597774442260; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200810172411.A13681E7CD8B@ary.local> <7e9326fc-ae27-d4bd-9f2b-9896da8320f1@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwacyBbJscEM_a4-nvugO0HBaSAdPqUPkfYYOOb++cOjQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5F396A77.3000109@isdg.net> <366e50ed8bda41cb879fa245e2d7c27a@bayviewphysicians.com> <CAJ4XoYev1WG8jWckSbkRmgxnJ1pM_CfM6-0Mhg9E6LraH1noyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZpGbr3Cv3_3tzERP8fx8u1fuMJ+ZS8W_=9jtqVAjgD8w@mail.gmail.com> <20ad2821-f705-d8d6-2921-a419e1bd0554@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20ad2821-f705-d8d6-2921-a419e1bd0554@gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:13:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZbiXPY93Ob_nRgcMb4hxppPnrubo9hP7yr5jz3UE6zUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000fef7805ad2ada6b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/CFWOQqqK9USGb3u9wAe3cu_EoXw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:14:05 -0000

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 6:09 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

>  DKIM was a synthesis within the IETF of two things (DomainKeys and IIM)
> that started outside.  It underwent significant evolution in the IETF --
> not once, but twice.
>
> Actually, it wasn't.
>
> The constituent parts were separately proposed, during the same initial
> IETF discussions, and the IETF said to go away and come back after
> reconciliation.  That work was done by an ad hoc industry team and there
> was a complete spec and initial implementations before the IETF was again
> approached.
>
Yep, I still have the t-shirt.

> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allman-dkim-base-00
>
> (and note that in the working group field on the title page, it says
> "pre-MASS"...)
>
> The work in the IETF was a refinement of a complete, integrated spec.
>
But it was quite a bit of refinement -- I would even say 'evolution" -- in
comparison to how little SPF and DMARC changed before publication.

-MSK