Re: [dmarc-ietf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12: (with COMMENT)

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 19 April 2021 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12F63A35F4; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHF753hL7O0l; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500F83A36A1; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id a9so24450510ioc.8; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hst3uymJvbPLQm3i3c9tmfd2C0juAxrDrRLKyB/KSmQ=; b=A+Hwky+NJ0SziyFnpjYHRjY8aE5OH3tq4fuXdYLssGV1peiZA0ymZfwLW6TbmcZ5Ke PHUltnnXGxMPEh8hNwuMVj63CSHoMK0svQGNpr6ODdydCM0ChuzLZtmksvadzlAYJ36B jo9fVScyuurn4lh0yjc/bjorfmwiKArLNhCH+db2jqTi6nbxOhiRMyO+WCKkgIG2sz/x Fth1NIBXayzZ3q7qknkg6mfFZ8vaxTpUfC4YlZb0pAockGVFs4VhGAg9zf3UlC4FYPf4 7bCsRc2FSvPKHmuMOP3+pTEH4OSbWC0KgjJb2v7b6Aq18XzRx1mNjZKPAQnLeYoM1un3 ckSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hst3uymJvbPLQm3i3c9tmfd2C0juAxrDrRLKyB/KSmQ=; b=CGG+UlINhpPfotCSRzSHkrFMoVvrRl9bYSVaBls7n2eTwwyEoE3vxdJvmtRYhL60ns avH0JfvxCXeaE9uay4DstNXFbHLgXi+ZnJ5o0RuDKbI0zNsyM7rgq7l7Ee3v9mAtz7qt esVfLVJh5Su2CxNbjkGsAUOaSWIv31GyfGOpklnOVgaGtHRAq83mVVdZ1VvVhfnJbF/z 90ZGFsIILU33stHwLn2g0uFZKSdAqVhvrMRdapsQfZbjB8TyKK9rxSYX0W0uIw8q4qcn 7ycaEDSGol3JR6ufB5qJwIZ6CVxnjkBWarA5P/lGjsQ6A86Nt2/F94bPZIlvrpfyGPuF 9Vzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nZmz9/QD3yVdz5YB5gR6u1oD4s9dJpT+oT0h8XuwOkspYyqc+ 5jdtIQ2AWmMzAkyphf2rmfVHXVhcHvhGkMtyWf8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzt3qk1JEQt/2RdIAZGnX/HKsOGn/G73s4aSb7v9L5HZtt6MxNj+A3KX6jG0Bv807Fdq/y52Afed9NNo5cArG0=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:4e45:: with SMTP id r66mr16717677jaa.137.1618846589865; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161847105823.12240.11886353486421150693@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADyWQ+HRSkOMvi2N5=q-pBiXGWGtfZXW+fjN5x5LqVq6LLeKdA@mail.gmail.com> <C098F99C-A00C-4663-8B0F-B5A4FC68BD16@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C098F99C-A00C-4663-8B0F-B5A4FC68BD16@cisco.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:36:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GDQjMUzhv4+6tJ-1HSOamSRF07g3=+PiFiCwAx-NU35g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dmarc-psd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dmarc-psd@ietf.org>, "dmarc-chairs@ietf.org" <dmarc-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ef517e05c05517ce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/CHJJvvw8WGK25yXs7tqr9p_vfKw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draf?= =?utf-8?q?t-ietf-dmarc-psd-12=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:36:50 -0000

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:43 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Tim,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your quick reply and the updates to the document.
>
>
>
> My comment on section 5.1 was actually on section 4.1 ... Sorry about the
> mix, I should drink more coffee it seems :-o
>
>
>

Ahh, I see what you are referring to.  I think it was written as a
subsection with the thought of adding this
section to the Privacy Considerations section of the DMARC-bis document.
 Perhaps some wording to reflect this?
"If this experiment is successful, this section should be incorporated into
the Privacy Considerations section
of DMARC-bis" ?

tim