IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] AD review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-18

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 28 October 2018 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B81112870E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9033i3b_083 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B62A1127332 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id d7-v6so4616752lfi.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jh95tlkk/22Bsc1IclJFqDXkF7ECDzqhHjrJl9yd/fc=; b=XUskcZXCe2CJthntC8mlNYIBLiVm1j5+VjYeXyoad4S0kex+Z+RZwjp1pujX+Lubxe N5X2DaxICD3+2B/Ze8d8+0TO0TRDK8vtvIe9HS7hB4lC2aBCEJedh4JRNA843Bup/Ney l3wP1CJLLwVJD0mvFUnPaHXhXKphieJKnenxuWCI2y/qyOa7swsBg8edBeR+sTXT7Fi0 PpshrTq5iGqf1i7Hyd0KdcEXw18hVbH+8363wcTmVljJMz8pSZGQ0uQMzOEJiQpU32oJ BmUjKFcex5srF7bP1edoKIGxeZruW+P6uoiFozwOJ2jjpdvkW0wgyb5pDC/ul9CXWk96 YdMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jh95tlkk/22Bsc1IclJFqDXkF7ECDzqhHjrJl9yd/fc=; b=rzi7IbujrVvtjkMaukQhEGt589F1llVMqq2l75zubWYgIUMo17mNYddTfM3Efes22t ojy4xBCz9bYTDPRQ7v4GUfsTDkoYsItq23YdyGvymXg3XQb8OQH286FKq1eIuDZY3Uvj 9HAHXg3VHOkyuMy11Lv7jfFMNGxDJV1EHtU50mxq5sDRVtlxHxCypbf1Dqrhakiyp79+ 7QDrTVuvVyN0x/coRpzvNnCY+AE+tDZ3/3NV8tFXg422NbdfF04QCt/UGUseHZXunl8G BdOel+62SRQGHY5mc6aG6xydCqXxdHYy7E0xTuydo3UK8tCO0eYFe3JRwFRmdf2ZD9fH jvvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLDu1pImb8VTVllLrKPTumY56o9OEbkEV8zw9IUZEFhWbd4ET/T s4QcTyxF892ZwGkpfzqz7T5+Z+3ygvIWTYD9T5vM4A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dCwmTabuh0Mb1Y5sie45IcroNb+jm82Vp4rMj4eSJkaroJJVKuwwqFi2mT2UtUPlF9OHg/v/E1oZABU5in4fk=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:2102:: with SMTP id h2-v6mr6409591lfh.119.1540765789774; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZ9x4tZhMFWrCGN4LNxTCHbSDMRJGAECuAJoev7VnGj=A@mail.gmail.com> <20181027144414.6892B200728CF9@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20181027144414.6892B200728CF9@ary.qy>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:29:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZaQ8LSkOzjF83zXLbEHp5692o46gJHYjc=Pc89R=b-tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000094e8f80579517d70"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/CrivnM_e5rrAQPuZQrrplwA23Do>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] AD review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-18
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 22:29:54 -0000

On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 7:44 AM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <CAL0qLwZ9x4tZhMFWrCGN4LNxTCHbSDMRJGAECuAJoev7VnGj=
> A@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >At least 7601bis will be an RFC at the same time as this one is, if not
> >sooner.  I don't know what the plans are for the other one.
>
> Also see Scott's LC comment on 7601bis.  There's a bunch of stuff in 7601
> not
> in the new draft, so 7601bis is really an update, not a replacement for
> 7601.
>

Well, I don't think it was the intent to do an update, so I'm going to have
to go review that.

I still think it will ship before ARC does, rendering Kurt's question moot
anyway.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email