Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC?
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 21 March 2019 17:45 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E637013151C
for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key)
reason="fail (message has been altered)"
header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5VKfPHNW5Eqy for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42A24131507
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net
[108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0)
by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id
x2LHlSKj011540
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:47:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net;
s=default; t=1553190449;
bh=xq4RQmIrq9w1mSANGZkFlf/SMhnSty29iEDh06u+LnA=;
h=Subject:To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
b=DtcyHq+CAtEdPcfIjigNoTchtSmEPPPueX4ZvCht9JsyAXvxyoPpfw0XmICwBeY7E
H4h0deYeV+aWzEpUSPUCWdqvGG483rBdoSELyRuUzeJHVnWJw4UWfUUUP7irLB3V74
3CzYhTC0f6Ew6MkoZ96iLKuCPBK7AAymQ47DjAjE=
To: Ken Simpson <ksimpson+ietfdmarc@mailchannels.com>,
John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <20190319184209.804E42010381DB@ary.qy>
<alpine.DEB.2.20.1903201442260.7108@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
<alpine.OSX.2.21.1903201042010.79863@ary.qy>
<CAJ4XoYcyaEBHYGPDY4ah_O+Obk-tijnL9SnxvzKyywu4BEmkrw@mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.OSX.2.21.1903211031070.83149@ary.qy>
<CAEYhs4GJeRhCQUxWxCDm8K46v_rTjER3ueoMRhMdUdZzK1ZSaQ@mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.OSX.2.21.1903211308550.83693@ary.qy>
<CAEYhs4EUNjtwvxwDauJx5pM8XsKxnAJipVsC9zZkmXm35_drfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <1c998977-c7aa-49ce-11f6-9b78c5faa39e@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:45:42 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEYhs4EUNjtwvxwDauJx5pM8XsKxnAJipVsC9zZkmXm35_drfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/CuwasSjE6c38ENKXnlQRg5fYdD0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:45:53 -0000
On 3/21/2019 10:12 AM, Ken Simpson wrote: > That would be crossing into the realm of tradecraft. While I understand and respect the reality of that point, I fear it is problematic from an industry standpoint... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Grant Taylor
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? DAMY gustavo
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? 'Bernie Hoeneisen'
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? DAMY gustavo
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Grant Taylor
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? DAMY gustavo
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Ken Simpson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Ken Simpson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Doug Foster
- [dmarc-ietf] SPF / Re: Email security beyond DMAR… Дилян Палаузов