[dmarc-ietf] Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on charter-ietf-dmarc-02-00: (with COMMENT)

[Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-dmarc-02-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dmarc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Please find some comments below:

# I guess this will be deleted from the version to be sent for external review:

CURRENT:
  DMARC Charter [DRAFT]

# Not sure which "consensus" we are talking about here. I think that we can
simply delete this sentence:

CURRENT:
   There now appears to be consensus to recharter
   in order to “un-abandon” the dangling document and complete the work.

# An instance of a WG: what does that mean?

CURRENT:
  This instance of the DMARC working group

# Business as usual

CURRENT:
  The responsible Area
  Director will have discretion regarding whether a full Last Call and
  IESG loop is needed to review those limited modifications.

Not sure we need to have in this in the charter. "normal" process will be
followed for these matters, IMO.

# Should we include a formal milestone for this check?

CURRENT:
  If it fails to meet this deadline or reaches consensus to cease work
  on the document, it will abandon that objective and instead begin the
  work of removing all references from the base document to the failure
  reporting document, and the latter will be permanently abandoned.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med