Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 08 June 2019 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6458A1200A3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 07:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=OJTUmD15; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Bh2a8um/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dx9z5hsPTkkA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 07:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9408612008F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 07:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6117 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2019 14:56:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=17e3.5cfbcc88.k1906; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=FXtzghrfg5xbyYUKHx+Mc63j6a3eIhk0KM1vEd6KvAY=; b=OJTUmD15lPC4S7v5KjeM7KQazD/U533XIGJlyAzLO18vjEEUgy659DjdRrI86/PoB+ouOqSLdIkspLefqqLbdusA8VInYMknuKFBmbQP0rzmQZLHvsmKZSNYufaeOqTI9sIeqlntyRXZ4XppWqVNxTTz7AQlPuwu1JT6KE3my2QOjZXpN0aSv1ndNcj0Jce5dB/LCL5oqyNvt3YNu0MHsiZIAmDXGtC1U2SglX6TNd440DXyQRs1HiAyGP3AvX53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=17e3.5cfbcc88.k1906; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=FXtzghrfg5xbyYUKHx+Mc63j6a3eIhk0KM1vEd6KvAY=; b=Bh2a8um/3g05XN0ZfeOhKNHyOdbPdBKM1p7lTBalvO3dTwf1cpUj1YV+ECqJc+1q/C68YveZo80J7x8mIaJhmw7ew6kXQ7gOfzMfXDFH5I1LZpzaBHaVLHzTE5URjgoQVVn/IAY7nWfRtjHS/gQbClhtfSL+CsgONuvnTl4aZFm0fmI7CFlvkZaFvvuzuF+r23XaS6shRD7Ae+803sE0UiDFPjT3ekKOxDL4cwmGXnuLszqCTCvgLofSyIjjqnRQ
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 08 Jun 2019 14:56:08 -0000
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 16:56:08 +0200
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.9999.1906081654560.1346@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Douglas E. Foster" <fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <1f3e445b735945369d93ce594c8fae65@bayviewphysicians.com>
References: <20190605200619.2ED512014FE9B7@ary.local> <787538c5-9032-8f4d-e3f2-7e3eeb357503@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.9999.1906061003130.2459@ary.local> <b7f40e8d-ddf1-8fb4-79a6-71158e0eeb91@dcrocker.net> <1f3e445b735945369d93ce594c8fae65@bayviewphysicians.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (OSX 337 2019-05-05)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/D3kyNQ6bHkmFWHBP_GzNqdt5dvg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Endless Loops with DKIM reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 14:56:13 -0000

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019, Douglas E. Foster wrote:
> Suggestions for eliminating loops:
  ...

These are all fine.

> I think these methods will eliminate the need for rate limiting.

BTDT.  Really, I have been doing various forms of autoresponders for 
thirty years, and no matter what you do, someone will loop back anyway, 
most likely from an address different from the one you sent the report to.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly