Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Sat, 20 March 2021 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FD53A14FF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpUTuxEqpFQ2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 291603A14FE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id d10so2797321ils.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KyJ6QRH+45IJOGgNxC0AWtSL90N2aZknY1HyfRslDDo=; b=PADAPwjNGfBUi7HJ5neN4rYynmKIBB3PL2Te002fa5UkxrXao8NI4jmhuSTETAqOVR EZXFpzJ6/YtGolzhz8D5Pflukh5sGEYXdAsNQhBvhBam6MdqF6umI3W1f3Faj4nZ/+61 GjEoX6/fDmIprTlnM4Bsw22foqTwSZXozs2o4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KyJ6QRH+45IJOGgNxC0AWtSL90N2aZknY1HyfRslDDo=; b=e0DC/pk+UoQm7XWyCueFrwROllYOI07eXulvveeVa9VQC/sxfez/NEYYOXowafD6yV Si/M8clutlv3kDi2r6OKqe2QZEE91s7vA5xCtgfkVojhyknxXEFobQG5bWjOqn5fcke2 2dBGYWEEgvGHlyLeYO0nMW8fuF4CnA0IwAVHyDjzFTvv/GH5LNyzz8AK1gJIkhDTjIcw o8K3/GzT/4DkgYtjF/d5JkIYcfdsrvPQcGOWT8GXEzzc/RJjaMsDxzqtt/fDBNRTWf31 MxV/Jz8umFpPyxtzjUM5qwcIfysohbmiTHV/7Y1iiKWofOGkq5DqannCMCaaIvV/1Pit inXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533T4617AlT0BlEn5aYn2H4ngzC8U162qSI01VcRmpnK1KGf/N+F touMTS02ggvyNtxUcj8BTrx64U2OWYY6tSVIkmrv0YcHJuc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcjkC0LvMVd303ZrLuZQBVzyCe3z9e8KZRUYFKqck9MJYoYKSiGfFuf8sC1LK3z2rxX9CdQtUCQgn8vyBKR/I=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:2806:: with SMTP id l6mr4566474ilf.103.1616199605901; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161616297099.26288.5532647192522385084@ietfa.amsl.com> <b6acffdb-9700-b078-6cd2-e76d7f677f32@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <b6acffdb-9700-b078-6cd2-e76d7f677f32@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:19:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1rfpzRGEScqDpw=z+Ukq=r6wF-UJd+uiGqYw9MaoEsRrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065744905bdeccba8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/DLdiHLafaQ4hkezXzmS8xXnfh6M>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 00:20:11 -0000

Good work on the updated phrasing, I'd make just a couple of changes to the
"tax" suggestion:

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>
> *Example*
>
> Since the algorithm (last word) hasn't been mentioned yet:
>
> OLD
>     Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is obviously not a
>     scalable strategy.  The intent of this specification, therefore, is
>     to enhance the DMARC algorithm by enabling an agent receiving such a
>     message to be able to determine that a relevant policy is present at
>     "gov.example", which is precluded by the current DMARC algorithm.
>
>
> NEW
>     Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is obviously not a
>     scalable strategy.  The intent of this specification, therefore, is
>     to enhance DMARC discovering method by enabling an agent receiving
> such a
>     message to be able to determine that a relevant policy is present at
>     "gov.example", which is precluded by the current DMARC specification.
>

1 - delete the word "obviously". I really don't think such a statement
belongs in a spec and can lead us down infinite rabbit trails.
2 - s/DMARC discovering/DMARC discovery/

--Kurt