Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 27 January 2021 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5423A0ECB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:13:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xqnm4KCGHWHk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:13:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61FAF3A0EC4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:13:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id i3so1193646uai.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:13:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3xfvEFOKChbQZQZE22PZykv7ACVV76y7WMwqZPuFzJ8=; b=ssF4DT5uRJNFvnJibff6963YH3uu9PNyCh9Q2uHKCLDT6yPCS/WxK0/GlP5/V0l7WX Up7QKkNSc2zjCGhuXr/73uavOwfeAa5Foauzu7FYUa+YdyaynPO7tZzgarOP6Mm3tH// 5GqRmQ35rzgRoJ1h9iI6+CMfgCEVajOXAlooAOdfee2YUrQlxSzSC8ezTYjmXRJgD8gy iutdwUWjW9LHJZQGPNM5XeRSZ0DmjSqO3fzS1LVdrThmmYc0XnpRFueWnEEVJOgizVVA aDmQgiMZSOypsDaDyk9LOHRV6FUUNCUJ+ltWFkAsI8jgX6uhFOOf7maORrl2pLqpMaM/ ET5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3xfvEFOKChbQZQZE22PZykv7ACVV76y7WMwqZPuFzJ8=; b=tXl13vHzkbYLjw8rmLL/t5gkZHu9XFmj0+ASJEj3RWX7dVcdH8rNtXs1iXueFlZWdb uXM7lOgUl1PErN/EA4SnAWyoyyQC/HdaEByBVWlZcB0J5wuSals+4+QxIqPCOVKZWeXC /W4iVoXD+SqQX5CpcvMXk5xJAJTfk4R9la4HSH5afOG/eP12IPAz9PuPiqkFRoksk6g7 gF5tG7WMNZqaA1AE4iOg/MPI3BQiWMhFpIneLxVpTFdSp0LbA2TvY+2e98DWNqVJYHY9 PNsx1YXobHAdnG5zAUK+WW9PA3tKh9/7Vsv9zgQCeEidiwI2qaqynfzvb5YRoreFliU9 0FAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306D5/OM0TWEtnsyA5z+NHkD8+cfVquNqFZSOc1yf1zcFW1w/2Z +c/SaUe5Bq6QT87qOoazQ4CnoN64ig0OTR9npBQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5yL08pizsfFY0ah0AHB2sIhYLOlzn0tRwi5GvpCJgjuPoOW+9ce4JzSvKsFXYmE0VXYsAdQs86bZ+zFFZGNQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:581:: with SMTP id e1mr9399876uae.47.1611778393365; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:13:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwaZx97cztehz_o=cCVZRbEP_yFVS9hTqWDKg7cMgjNvFg@mail.gmail.com> <20210116034026.5C93F6AC0428@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwatEsNrfF5GeWoVhrk_By8K84mYdBNOUFiN7cBaAch8JQ@mail.gmail.com> <29f5c140-6b07-e3be-f188-8b2104690385@tana.it> <52ea482c-86f8-f879-eefb-ff14e8819b56@taugh.com> <d54e8930-5266-7622-183d-023f9e35e385@tana.it> <13f04f5a-4176-db79-ca4a-a99686e76edf@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <13f04f5a-4176-db79-ca4a-a99686e76edf@taugh.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:13:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY5BbwvS9XXqBk=Mp074ntN=NeS97pJAxPBdQEZAsgohg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000097e1bb05b9e766ed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/De4bVfHFxcq9nKOS6MKVkhYXyzg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:13:21 -0000

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:38 AM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Stop there.  If you don't want failure reports, don't send unaligned
> messages.
>

I could be sold on the idea that there's not a problem for us to fix in the
protocol here, but what about the notion that it's something that might
warrant a sentence or two of informative text (i.e., that this is a problem
that can occur and possibly cause operational pressure)?

-MSK