Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 06 December 2020 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66533A04BC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 17:48:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=un0oxGfo; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=CqHkkL8U
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LnkuBisEjiP0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 17:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DABB33A048B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 17:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 31068 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2020 01:48:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7950.5fcc3850.k2012; bh=KDq/5+Xw520cDygdjBH7Yg7Y2uSW0KOnfdT7O7ZeDdU=; b=un0oxGfohThM3VeQabCsfGK8SauoS0Lifx/+NMGVGbNx+J6P5xeF5UNdXY0/c047cDH9GcZvEQtKreKBPLEFjChQW8cKY8J1TCROIuDnjDxmBs+sg3fPYJDiTpxIzn5IrSfekPlMUTu0Vf+2HiYefWGXLxpV/bx6bYiybdCY5TX3s0jB5uChUVkRQxBLCFvSOX9a9v/zkkuTY5zSZuyfPTKOeOrLcf7+Lb4oIbM/0mo7myonz9SQsI3L4iwN/kTmtc9QsvrTPaX1ZoYBnn8R8JkPXKhw4lvRu9W06oJUZQoMRERQZAgHZ41UxJv9hJnHc/CMP44cRdAIbwBr0uqk6Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7950.5fcc3850.k2012; bh=KDq/5+Xw520cDygdjBH7Yg7Y2uSW0KOnfdT7O7ZeDdU=; b=CqHkkL8UgHHeANl/iOs5yjEaZE8zG9AdKPTubIRvjQXXYA0UQnVGYXoGXBTuOid71kNcFEoseMsZpPJEhJS9NlwlEnJ3e6QMCTkNUgNd62KWQe4nas2N94yO55dQDM/hp7f4Y5i3K77eIMBRRxtPczM+i6/O9ZdDrHCISv06dftl/lJCIAlNiv5EiE6QMtlnE8M1AHMh55RlplhQWjXPk5IqIY02hB4VZUlZAK4US+2s9KExl8nQyFc8Of3tI0g9rJ00oqIB/ep9B5psTii0ZwQFiZtTBVfL33KuDjQQBN9QpWuLxB7AZKHlryaZ839C1O/ZrdP43e++ZrSNKMoE2w==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 06 Dec 2020 01:48:00 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 26A202910056; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 20:47:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: 5 Dec 2020 20:47:59 -0500
Message-Id: <20201206014800.26A202910056@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: dcrocker@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <cb526017-c198-44f1-7282-986e5a810d6a@gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/DuSGyDUnKR_GaWuzxaRBXfoYD9g>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 01:48:06 -0000

In article <cb526017-c198-44f1-7282-986e5a810d6a@gmail.com> you write:
>The domain owner might want all sorts of unreasonable things. Having a 
>way to let the domain owner publish demands that are widely ignored 
>indicates a seriously flawed semantic model. And that is, indeed, the 
>current reality for DMARC.

Thanks. Lest anyone think this is a new issue, see this message I sent
to the DKIM list in 2006, fourteen years ago:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/CBsHbUVtM512vgiwljiA6dtVJ1Q/#

I reprised it six years ago in 2014:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ngPmSfa0b_B5Q72G1JwzGG2IYKY/

R's,
John