Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?

Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com> Wed, 12 August 2020 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <neil@marmot-tech.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4FC3A12D0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=marmot-tech.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4Z1y6VVXJsv for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50DC03A12D2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id y18so1545174ilp.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marmot-tech.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nuZTP/KWHBe8gcaLR1G4L2N5c4xfbOT26T+6JIU9jD4=; b=RJDV46M2+CIpZPJ9PQUEgJRVllVHQxu11eRxjTSlrSywmzHfJ+fjHFyajGFKeOMmOa 6PfyqQjKJ73h+GWwsbHznyidriASc4Od1Ml4bVW9PDIzk9wY9Xju8jSAUvkRfY/HO9D7 fvOSZsKGA0iCiVTOGqhN/REy1Kw/4BByg2Alw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nuZTP/KWHBe8gcaLR1G4L2N5c4xfbOT26T+6JIU9jD4=; b=HHTg/UgfxSiTN2tGFbdvnOuv2OIlFydddu6ftkUGGVJ+5qMWgmmp4jeDnITJaxEQTa xemMUc9Jl4WAfsxvlQ09tTKNjMInNVxbBESqHOFCDAnmh6se6xMX7PN9pnD445qrQGRu p/jocwY12yyA1bMz3O1RFv3nEg2w0XwJK6RuaYyT7YelFyCQ1k94WdpE3I/JZTRsqvGc Fdlfxd0f0PiBCyKxioG1UN2a8AX3/Qhg4Okbj90ax2XD0hxChz1AppKZp1dvL7YjtONK WareajMax+GacqforwtD7Rqa4/uTMMbHgYecyKXXzNMpb0N9Rg4UKZQ5j7j6ooKYQIgw Y1oQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VD++Z/GgiD7NwYZh1rNlQB/LuAM8DBi8f97/0rbSqkkSdk3Fp 1FHy/SMp/mTYIaCyPgDmzzG9pnH6EV/yOnwNEaiXDw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxruxi7Y9PSKsVYxk9PfnAVuN/BN1Uqgs2qulXpJaohIEi49UaE/Q4SlY89MscWCVSf01wO1RDGcQ6W3EEw0jA=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:85c8:: with SMTP id f191mr28783444ilh.242.1597238671556; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200811034740.BA1831E7FDBF@ary.local> <0c8afc68-bc51-702a-c794-610b2d355836@dcrocker.net> <CAOPP4WFVdTL6HywMCFbunOYMAb3aYcEjY37So6=KgyK+Fthh1A@mail.gmail.com> <2d407924-835c-38ae-b54b-d9b6cf3aadcb@dcrocker.net> <CAOPP4WF3Bu4-EyND0yHPhDCBwCzk0_rupc9tMLAtJ9jUPGagaw@mail.gmail.com> <c9ec04e3-cb6f-2a3b-2aa5-3b249260e318@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <c9ec04e3-cb6f-2a3b-2aa5-3b249260e318@dcrocker.net>
From: Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:23:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOPP4WG4oCG_EBYGtj8=fZ9q2035tmso=8DvQPz4jVKwucoZrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a3d9dd05acae1ba6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/EK187q0x1GEYoZqGsc6zVTxZpWc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:24:41 -0000

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:04 AM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 8/12/2020 5:55 AM, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 5:13 AM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net
> > <mailto:dhc@dcrocker.net>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 8/12/2020 4:45 AM, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
> >      > Mr. Crocker, is there a document that describes some of these
> >     proposals
> >      > and perhaps the best arguments for an against somewhere? The
> >     firehose of
> >      > learning would a bit easier if there were a FAQ. I think it might
> >     even
> >      > help the participants if this was all documented. Yes, I know
> >     there's
> >      > the archived but I mean an organized and linear doc.
> >
> >
> >
> >     If you have particular questions, ask them.
> >
> >
> > I've just recently started lurking but I think this is a discussion
> > about semantics. What to call a proposed RFC5322.Sender field.
>
> The reference to field name was for an alternative to the rfc5322.From
> field, not sender.
>
>
> > The problem being addressed is the munging of headers by mailing lists
> > and other forwarders, breaking things like DKIM.
>
> mailing lists pretty much always break DKIM.  One of the proposals is to
> try to recover signature validation, post hoc.
>
> > I've not been lurking long enough to grok what's going on but I'll
> > continue to lurk and learn, eventually finding a small way to contribute
> > to this effort even if it's just to sweep out the IETF Ashram. :-)
>
>
> Welcome aboard.
>
> Thank you. That was a warm welcome. The guy who recommended this list to
me suggested I lurk for like a year or get eaten alive. IETF are more
relaxed than I expected.


> d/
>
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>