Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #60 - definition of NP
Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 20:52 UTC
Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE04C3A0E32 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXvzlJEoNlPv for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71D53A0E31 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id o1so8598038qta.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IF0ZYYiFQH+Am1gLME3RsdpfNwP+VmXDvLHkLXdQnp8=; b=XMCUkQe5oq1fRPfCdJo5eO3Ypg7Y7s6/dmOxyffGvItOt0gBzy2ftHnhpfy1cxVOS4 DUdQq/o1JlyglTZktNc8pQVWIWRt5/Tht3spmwMMtwrRZKJs+cfP36za8NrioIJ+sKKQ 16rrEeYtOjh+nvMFaiVJSxnDdOto0NJ3fZbrrIfz9KHRJqjJc01GiiQw8zeIXsRlX7vr 0lY4P3+zVO9jRyveybVg/bc1g6CsYhh9eLkTJlOOtqFr1mzM0FsJ4Vw2xK7wFvOamGBi AEplTUPq54EQhXkvuSaS6GEobGXhLFLc2KFo/V2XdiUjMD9t3D0pAFc0xQHgzkjRFw+U Qq6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=IF0ZYYiFQH+Am1gLME3RsdpfNwP+VmXDvLHkLXdQnp8=; b=XU02tIe7B28WEYEZzNmIBp/FgZkzrNtl8iHc13j9ZeAzjknNE2/O4UYg3immB9XMii xW7QFVPTGHXpPfWn3I+wL1dRTUDG3K7I4ADlW0x+Hb9BhGzqu5nca1bWew6mjCHpB0IG 9J9x7+gglXslkHIlX63zN2Qw0qlg6OrOAJzkI0f/g7BHQt1IbXVXHPah1zPfAYRdmnxR dDa1srPjCCadnoYR3ekYbi1S4cXITvA2myRnZYbGwmyWYPRyr5OEIOyL4gylt7lsD3Zk FbUkBmeXxZQNygs81+oixL/eHJnC6tXNuz6gRarLVKqTpP5NqqpjZUj3ZFJT89E+jxTN odjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nT597jQywStK49exrKgi70aBjt6S0TNSBsgaxtFqqr8BRMNa6 FqcE+Hy/7GTJuNW0SUzGv108ouWl3XV75uBKuJFjU5h6C7kWrw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVIGRCz7CKm7fR2yEdTf69R1vUTDFH/iPSnfcCj++ybupltGVvvKKrchxlglbjHuYvU2QEG0k1cNPCUdeaWhg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1353:: with SMTP id w19mr1316263qtk.220.1619729558218; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH48Zfw7KDKbaV7Z6psPRTsrrVsKxCWbw1yKNSJVdf5+sgXbUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfw7KDKbaV7Z6psPRTsrrVsKxCWbw1yKNSJVdf5+sgXbUA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:52:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8=CLjeDHjND-n9j6c613KoNrRhWCOnCdWmzHWyXLH4cPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f3489605c122ac07"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/F78ABzv1LO41qUeS1tL6dfsLZZg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #60 - definition of NP
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:52:47 -0000
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:23 PM Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote: > There is much to like about the new document. Thank you to the design > team for your good work. > > For the NP policy, the MX/A/AAA test lacks the precise definition that I > would expect to be required for a standards-track document. Does another > document have language that we can use or reference? > > Additionally, it needs language to explain why this is the appropriate > test for separating between the SP policy and the NP policy. > > The proposed language in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-01 regarding the np tag came from draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12, specifically section 3.2 of that document <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/>. This is also detailed in ticket 108 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/108> Ticket 60 is currently associated with the aggregate reporting document, but 'np' doesn't appear in that document, so perhaps ticket 60 needs to be re-assigned to the DMARCbis base spec. Either way, it doesn't appear that ticket 60 has been worked on yet. Feel free to propose additional language modifications either in one of the two tickets on in this thread. -- *Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager *e:* todd.herr@valimail.com *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
- [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #60 - definition of NP Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #60 - definition of NP Todd Herr